Search results

A Grand Jury indictment doesn't mean a defendant is guilty. And yes I know you didn't claim this. Just making things clear. I don't even know what evidence the Grand Jury used to indict in this case. https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-indictment-hush-money-stormy-daniels/index.html

From your link. This makes it clear for everyone. I'm not confused. Thanks for the link.

This is what he's charged with. I'm waiting to see any evidence that he falsified any business records. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indictment-34-felony-counts-charges-new-york-read/

Thanks.

This whole trial is a waste of time and taxpayer money in my opinion. JMO.

The OP did. That's who I asked for a link to support their statement about a stipulation issue. This trial is about the falsification of business records and not about unrelated extramarital activity's. JMO.

I don't blame them for not cooperating with that. Those video's should not have been allowed at all. JMO.

Thanks for the link. I see no mention of a stipulation. I'm still unsure why this judge has allowed the jury to see evidence that is unrelated to this case. Seems prejudicial to me. JMO.

What CSPAN footage? Do you have a link?

Your link say's it was a single encounter. She "spurned" him. As in rejected him afterwards. Unless you're saying they met in person later on. That's not the point of my comment. JMO.

They also would have done the prosecution a favor by doing a stipulation. Stormy hasn't helped in proving their case in my opinion. Daniels Humiliated Trump, But Might Have Helped His Case

Yes. The prosecution wanted all of the extraneous details of the single encounter between Stormy and President Trump to be heard by the jury. They probably could have done a stipulation that the event had happened and never even called her as a witness. JMO.

One thing for sure is Stormy Daniels knows nothing about whether President Trump falsified any business records. Hopefully a least one juror we see that her testimony is worthless. JMO.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-attend-fundraiser-day-barrons-graduation-1897759

I'm a Trump follower/supporter and will never roit or cause any chaos if the judge puts him in jail. JMO.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/michael-cohen-cashing-trump-trial-tiktok-livestreams-problem/story?id=109695141 Looks like Michael Cohen can't pass up talking about this case. I would like to know how much money he's getting from these TikTok "Diamonds" people are sending to him. JMO.

Correct. The previous DA Cyrus Vance did not file charges. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-manhattan-district-attorney-case-donald-trump/story?id=98389444 DA Bragg filed the charges in April 2023...

Looks like this killer didn't care much about not being allowed to posses a firearm because he was a convicted felon. In 2012 he was arrested for the same thing. Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/crime/article288117775.html#storylink=cpy...

So either someone asked for a gag order and the judge denied the request or no one else asked for a gag order? I'm not certain that a judge cannot issue a gag order on their own. Does anyone else know the answer to these questions?

Thanks for your reply. I still find it interesting that Cohen has decided to stop posting on social media at this stage of the trial. JMO.