All credits to Romulus for the translation actually.
Ok Romulus, let think about your hypothesis a bit further. Because whatever the angle, it is soooooo convoluted that it seems very unlikely IMO. I would even say implausible.
1) She was a tourist in Italy and had medical complications, thus fitting a new IUD in emergency.
The problem is that there is no hint of medical issues relevant of said complications in the autopsy report.
So, either there were none, or they were covered up. Unless otherwise proven, I lean towards the former, ie no hint of the slightest relevant complication.
The latter seems more like sci-fi than the reality of life.
2) She was visiting relatives. So, the relative asks her doctor to prescribe an IUD purposely for said relative but actually for the UID. This one is absolutely implausible.
Before prescribing the right IUD, the physician has to examine the cervix and uterus because the right IUD depends of cervix and uterus size, but also its shape. Unless said doctor conducted a recent intimate exam to the UID, I strongly doubt he would prescribe an IUD purposely for said relative but actually for the UID. Actually, such process is nonsensical.
3) She was a tourist living in America but thought it would had been a great idea to get an IUD while in Italy.
But you need to find a doctor, get the prescription, fit an appointment for the actual fitting. time you can actually spend to enjoy your holidays.
What's the point of such a hassle when you're on holidays, unless you have a medical emergency ?
For the medical complications, back to #1.
So, Romulus, without the IUD, your theory would make completely sense.
Its absolute contradiction is the IUD.
Ok Romulus, let think about your hypothesis a bit further. Because whatever the angle, it is soooooo convoluted that it seems very unlikely IMO. I would even say implausible.
1) She was a tourist in Italy and had medical complications, thus fitting a new IUD in emergency.
The problem is that there is no hint of medical issues relevant of said complications in the autopsy report.
So, either there were none, or they were covered up. Unless otherwise proven, I lean towards the former, ie no hint of the slightest relevant complication.
The latter seems more like sci-fi than the reality of life.
2) She was visiting relatives. So, the relative asks her doctor to prescribe an IUD purposely for said relative but actually for the UID. This one is absolutely implausible.
Before prescribing the right IUD, the physician has to examine the cervix and uterus because the right IUD depends of cervix and uterus size, but also its shape. Unless said doctor conducted a recent intimate exam to the UID, I strongly doubt he would prescribe an IUD purposely for said relative but actually for the UID. Actually, such process is nonsensical.
3) She was a tourist living in America but thought it would had been a great idea to get an IUD while in Italy.
But you need to find a doctor, get the prescription, fit an appointment for the actual fitting. time you can actually spend to enjoy your holidays.
What's the point of such a hassle when you're on holidays, unless you have a medical emergency ?
For the medical complications, back to #1.
So, Romulus, without the IUD, your theory would make completely sense.
Its absolute contradiction is the IUD.