layer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2017
- Messages
- 2,451
- Reaction score
- 17,896
So you've looked at the evidence?Click has a theory of the case, but actually no evidence that connects his suspects to the crime.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you've looked at the evidence?Click has a theory of the case, but actually no evidence that connects his suspects to the crime.
So you've looked at the evidence?
Citations in documents by the state would be sufficient, but from what I have read their case is alarmingly weak. For example, when were these alleged confessions? Why are they not cited anywhere official that I’m aware of (the media doesn’t count, I mean official documents). I would like to know the date of the calls, the time duration of the calls, and ultimately if I was a juror I want to hear the calls-as we all know the calls are recorded, so there should be a recording unless the prison has a similar sloppy method of record keeping as CC. Until I see or hear something official (I.e. in official docs), it’s not fact to me. Personally I believe there were multiple perps.
Is it? As someone who knows more law then I do, do you think the lost for 5 years, misfiled note (without a recording) from the LE who RA talked to back in 2017will be allowed into evidence at the trial or is the chain of custody to broken? I’m assuming that is when he said he was on the bridge between 1:30 and 3:30.I think it is fair to say he has given 2 different times.
Is it? As someone who knows more law then I do, do you think the lost for 5 years, misfiled note (without a recording) from the LE who RA talked to back in 2017will be allowed into evidence at the trial or is the chain of custody to broken? I’m assuming that is when he said he was on the bridge between 1:30 and 3:30.
‘Clerical error’ may have led police to overlook Richard Allen in Delphi case
DELPHI, Ind. – Why now? That’s one of the biggest questions surrounding the arrest of Richard Allen, who’s charged with murdering Abby Williams and Libby German in February 2017. It appears a “cler…fox59.com
04/03/2024 | Order Issued State of Indiana's Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records (mental health records) filed March 14, 2024 granted without hearing. State of Indiana's Motion for Leave of Court to Subpoena Third-Party Records (medical records) filed March 14, 2024, granted without hearing. Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ |
Just for clarity...I think one powerful argument here is the tip sheet itself is the contemporaneous record and thus more reliable than what the accused says years later.
I've said it in the past, but I would hate to find myself in a similar situation.
I am incredibly nearsighted and I've slipped and shattered an ankle. As a result, when I walk, I pay attention to the ground--where I am stepping. I am completely oblivious to people around me. I also like to keep to myself when I go out on walks and am fairly shy. I could easily see myself in a situation like this, especially because I have the worst luck (read: shattered ankle )
Maybe you would have 'wanted' to scream. But many crime victims will tell you that at the key moment when they needed and wanted to scream, for some unknown reason, they could not make a scream happen. It is like you are frozen.
It is a common experience of violent crime victims, imo.
Who among the Vinlander associates (not necessarily those named heretofore) might take note of EF's desire to belong and use that desire to pull off a baffling crime that went unsolved for at least 5 years (perhaps still remains so, IMO)? EF is a full grown man, regardless of the status of his mental capacity (read: intimidating to teen girls).So what did EF bring to the Vinlander table (or whatever name we want to call this group)? The transcript shows the associations of at least 5 men. These guys he associated with were not some kind of a do-gooder social club. IMO not people who would feel sorry for poor slow EF and just want to give him a leg up.
Read the Click testimony.
March 18, 2024 Motion to Dismiss Hearing.pdf
drive.google.com
Who did you walk past at 3:30 pm on that date in 2017?Yet he denied seeing the girls which knowing the fact makes it highly suspicious. They are on his path he had to have seen them and so why deny that.
Are we meant to believe he was blind or hid in a bush until they walked past him?
The good news is no jury will believe something like this as an excuse if the defense try and play this game as that duck won’t hunt imo.
If it was me, I'd figure LE had cleared me and carried on to trying to find the killer.If you were to find yourself in a similar situation and you had tipped in you were on the bridge wearing BG clothes but completely innocent when your picture was still being broadcast around the country with appeals to identity would you walk across the street from work to the Sheriff’s with your attorney and get it straightened out?
What are the odds the Defense step down as by the looks it and the mess they have created they won’t be ready for trial?!
if they care for RA as much they claim their best bet at this juncture is to step down and give it to more capable lawyers.
IMO
Seems to me RA's phone records (geotraking etc) could provide the contemporaneous record that will confirm his time at the trails. IMO. We'll see at trial.This is where it is going to matter a great deal what he said in his police interview, and the testimony of the officer who took the tip, and all that background you refer to.
The defence will obviously dispute accuracy (they already did in Franks)
The prosecution will point to verifiable detail in the tip (the girls he saw, his IMEI number, the specifics of what he was doing etc). e.g. if the IMEI is correct, is there any reason to think the time is wrong? Especially if cross checked against the 3 girls?
I think one powerful argument here is the tip sheet itself is the contemporaneous record and thus more reliable than what the accused says years later.
But sure, they will dispute it. As to whether they try to exclude it, I don't know.
Snipped for focus - Unless they are RIGHT. Lebrato seemed convined after a brief stint as his lawyer. Yes, I know he walked his statement back to "presumption of innocence" the next day, but probably because he got tsk tsked. Maybe this is all just a big circus. (Peru IS, after all, the circus capital of the US.) But if it's NOT and there IS an actual conspiracy afoot, I applaud these lawyers for doing everything they can to shed light on it. I live in Indiana, and none of this would surprise me one whit.They certainly won’t step down for RA’s sake. They do not seem to care a rip about him.
If it was me, I'd figure LE had cleared me and carried on to trying to find the killer.
If, as you suggest, RA was such an obvious suspect after making the tip, why didn't detectives walk across the street from the Sheriff’s with the district attorney and get it straightened out?
They give a rip about him. One to the tune of $50 grand and counting out-of-his-own-pocket care.Snipped for focus - Unless they are RIGHT. Lebrato seemed convined after a brief stint as his lawyer. Yes, I know he walked his statement back to "presumption of innocence" the next day, but probably because he got tsk tsked. Maybe this is all just a big circus. (Peru IS, after all, the circus capital of the US.) But if it's NOT and there IS an actual conspiracy afoot, I applaud these lawyers for doing everything they can to shed light on it. I live in Indiana, and none of this would surprise me one whit.
Do you have links for either? IIRC, he said he was on the bridge, but not at the time the victims were. And no witness has Identified RA as bridge guy, as far as we know.
He was standing on the first platform of the Monon High Bridge, the witness told police. She then saw the two victims walking toward the bridge
Then another girl said“He was walking with a purpose and kept his head down.”
He had his hands in his pockets
RSBM/bbmThe fact that Click's involvement with the investigation ended the day that Ferency was killed outside FBI office in Terre Haute (and that he explicitly stated that his involvement ended on that date in testimony) - I don't know what, exactly, that means. What happened to that Joint Task Force? I wonder if the FBI decided after the ambush that it better only use FBI agents while investigating this and closed ranks.
I am glad the trial is slated to start soon. I do wish it would be televised so we could all watch with our own eyes. I've read most of the transcripts for this case and will do so for the trial, but wow that will be a LOT of reading, and one can't get tone and body language from text.