pufnstuf
"Yes, she's emotionally disturbed. She's unbalance
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 3,329
- Reaction score
- 22
Dede is a volunteer garden apprentice/intern who had been working at the property for only one month before Kyron disappeared.
On April 27, she met the owner of the property.
On May 5, she was working at the property.
Whether she is an intern, apprentice, or employee isn't the major point. The major point is that, like with any other job, she would have been given specific tasks and she would be expected to be working at those tasks. The owner didn't say, "There's 40 acres! Have at it!"
The owner expected to know where Dede was on the property. When Dede couldn't be located at the location/task that she had been assigned, then the property owner phoned her. No answer. So her co-worker looked for her. No Dede.
If Dede will cooperate with investigators, since she claims that she "never left the property," all she has to tell them is where she was on the property, and they can verify that. But my understanding is that she won't tell them this.
Why won't she tell them where she was on the property? Because Terri's whole plan is based on plausible deniability and confusion. Look at her emails about the teacher. The doctor's appointment confusion. Planning this on a day when a science fair would be going on and the school would be chaotic. And...
Dede working on a farm near to the abduction site, ready to walk off the job to assist, while all the while claiming, "but I never left the property." After all, it's 40 acres, so the owner and other worker just didn't search hard enough for her. Riiight.
Plausible deniability and confusion.
*********
JMO
On April 27, she met the owner of the property.
On May 5, she was working at the property.
Whether she is an intern, apprentice, or employee isn't the major point. The major point is that, like with any other job, she would have been given specific tasks and she would be expected to be working at those tasks. The owner didn't say, "There's 40 acres! Have at it!"
The owner expected to know where Dede was on the property. When Dede couldn't be located at the location/task that she had been assigned, then the property owner phoned her. No answer. So her co-worker looked for her. No Dede.
If Dede will cooperate with investigators, since she claims that she "never left the property," all she has to tell them is where she was on the property, and they can verify that. But my understanding is that she won't tell them this.
Why won't she tell them where she was on the property? Because Terri's whole plan is based on plausible deniability and confusion. Look at her emails about the teacher. The doctor's appointment confusion. Planning this on a day when a science fair would be going on and the school would be chaotic. And...
Dede working on a farm near to the abduction site, ready to walk off the job to assist, while all the while claiming, "but I never left the property." After all, it's 40 acres, so the owner and other worker just didn't search hard enough for her. Riiight.
Plausible deniability and confusion.
*********
JMO