It has allready been established that the deviant *advertiser censored* images were not in the possession of either SA or BD, they were in someone else's home and have not been tied to either SA or BD. It is unrelated to this case, so put that to rest.
Thanks, but that is incorrect.
A flash drive AND CD containing such images were found in Billie's dresser drawer, in her bedroom. A drawer Billie herself states was used by Shawn Atkins.
All of the other stuff mentioned is fairly typical for lower ecomomic stratas in society, it does not imply any sort of guilt.
Failing a polygraph is typical of persons in the "lower economic strata"? Wow, that's news to me!
We need to rely on facts or evidence directly bearing on the case. Such as physical evidence of a crime or opportunity or motive to do so.
IMO being home alone with Hailey, at a time of day when she would not have expected him to be home qualifies as plenty of "opportunity". If SA or BD can be excluded based on evidence which reasonably places them elsewhere when the possible crime could have occurred, they
are excluded no matter what you might think of them as human beings.
There is no one other than Billie or SA who claims to have seen Hailey after she returned from Clint's on Sunday. The sightings that place Hailey on the street with two girls, as well as the account of the hairdresser have been investigated and cannot be verified.
The fact that people don't like them does not make them suspects.
I don't particularly admire the conduct of most of the players in this case, however I do not regard them all as suspects.
Well, if there really are pictures of HD wearing the earrings on the xbox the night before she dissappeared, and if the rings were subsequently found at the fathers house, it pretty much proves that she was there that day contary to what they claim. And it would be reasonable to question why.
Yes, it would. And I question why thus far, the only source for this claim appears to be Billie Dunn.
If that is true then it pretty makes everyone in that household and what they say questionable. It also means that HD must have been in one piece at least until SA got back from Big Spring, and he simply would not have had enough time to do anything in the window that would have been available.
So,
if the earring allegations are true then SA is pretty much off the hook. I don't see how BD could believe he is involved if that is the case, it isn't rational. In fact, I would say that it is fairly clear where her suspicions lie, even if she isn't overtly saying so. Why she isnt being blunt about it, now that is an interesting question.
Like I said,
if these allegations are true then whatever happened to HD probably happened after she left the house that afternoon.
IF she in fact ever left the house that afternoon. We have no one other than SA to back up that claim. I don't see what other interpretation there could be. There are a whole lot of possibilities after that point, we simply don't have enough information beyond that to speculate. However, it would imply that at least some people in CD's residence and possibly others have not been forthcoming. As I said in a previous post, that does not imply guilt as all of the people involved in this case may have their own reasons for not being entirely truthfull, reasons that would likely have nothing to do with HDs dissappearance.
When I read posts here we see people say "I would do this" or "I would never do that", but they are not BD or SA or CD or any of the others, the posters don't know what is going on in these peoples lives, what is important to them personally and what other secrets (which have nothing to do with HD) they might not want the relatives or friends and especially LE knowing about. So, a little white lie here, a little less explanation there and so on in public. They might be hiding something, but that does not mean that something has to do with HD. It could be that is just standard practice in their social circles. That is why we need to focus on things which are fact, or claimed to be fact, and be objective in our assessment of these things, and not go on emotion based on whether we do or don't like a particular person.
Also, we know there is a discrepancy between what MB's mother publically claimed and the text message allegation. So, we do not have the full story there either.
You've mentioned this so-called discrepancy more than once. Could you please clarify?
The "WRUD" text was sent from Billie's phone just after 2pm that Monday. MB never responded. That doesn't sound like a confirmation of a sleepover to me, and we have no way of knowing it was actually Hailey who sent the text.
Whatever the case, if there really is pictorial evidence of HD wearing the earrings the night before, it is a game changer.
I agree, and will gladly believe that evidence when I see it for myself. 
