I think that's the first time I've heard of an apology as an ambush.
How about an apology BY ambush!
I think that's the first time I've heard of an apology as an ambush.
It may be clear to you but it's not fact. But yes, we are all entitled to our opinions and assumptions.
Trayvon had no evidence of scrapes to his knuckles that would indicate he was hitting someone, according to the mortician. The wounds do not look like he was getting "whooped" to me. But then I work a lot of DV cases (and I fought a lot as a child), so I know what it looks like when someone gets "whooped".
IMO, it appears he was in a scuffle. I wish I could show you photos of some of my clients who got "whooped."
I think as far as him bleeding, we clearly see the officer not using gloves when handling him in the station. So, it's either one of two ways:
1 - He really was bleeding, in which case the officer is very much wrong for not wearing gloves.
2 - He really wasn't bleeding, in which case the police report is fabricated.
Either way, it looks bad on SPD.
I think we may just have our first Webslueths experiment in this case??
So, who is going to go sit outside of Target and do a survey on how many people carry a gun and two flashlights on their waistband to go shopping?
Work called this morning and I'm just now home.. Is he still in jail or has bond been posted? How much has to be put up for him to get out? TYIA
That, in a nutshell, is my problem with GZ's whole story. He is the only source, and he has a tremendous motive to lie. When I add in the obvious (to me) inconsistencies in his story, changing facts, distance of the body from where he says the fight happened, hinkiness in how the body was found, etc. etc. etc...Only problem for me is there is only one source (the GF) who is saying this and although I don't have any reason to believe she's lying, I haven't heard her full story either, the context of the entire conversation, what the voice who said 'do you have a problem' sounded like, etc.
A picture of GZ's face would be worth more!
You don't think there are people in a Target right this minute who happen to have an CCP and are not carrying a gun? How would you know, not everyone has them out in the open?
I missed on how big these flashlights were. I think one was on a keychain, no?
Well, you do have Daddy Zimmerman saying that Trayvon asked George "What's your *advertiser censored**ing problem?"
Also, didn't Tracy tell the media that LE told him that Trayvon had confronted George while he was in his vehicle and now we see that George said that Trayvon circled his truck three times??
This is going to be messy! The truth doesn't change!
Yes - I've had tiny nicks on the face and head bleed all over the place. One was a nick over one eye from a metal fragment. I had to finish a fence repair and in that five minutes, I had blood running down my face and dripping onto my T-shirt and my jeans. When I got back to the barn, people freaked out because of all the blood. Oh, and I am not normally a bleeder - I've got great clotting factors.
That was from a cut less than a quarter of an inch long!
IMO, JMO, etc.
And I think that is pathetic..JMHO.
They also admitted they do not have evidence that GZ was actually following TM. When the investigator was asked what evidence they had he said a witness saw shadows, but declined to say which witness.
I think if you are going to bring 2nd degree murder charges that you need proof of who started the physical fight and proof that the shooter was following him.
I would vote guilty right now for involuntary manslaughter, but 2nd degree, I have reasonable doubt.
I just want one question answered.
If George Zimmerman intended to stop following Trayvon, why didn't he agree to meet police at his home or at the mailboxes. Why did he need a phone call to "see where he's at"?? Keeping an eye on Trayvon is the same thing as following him; you can't keep an eye on someone without moving where they move---which is following.
IMO
Someone, please, answer that logically.
Only problem for me is there is only one source (the GF) who is saying this and although I don't have any reason to believe she's lying, I haven't heard her full story either, the context of the entire conversation, what the voice who said 'do you have a problem' sounded like, etc.
You don't think there are people in a Target right this minute who happen to have an CCP and are not carrying a gun? How would you know, not everyone has them out in the open?
I missed on how big these flashlights were. I think one was on a keychain, no?
I don't believe Target has a policy against firearms for one (I carry in there all time, sometimes more sloppily than others; no one's ever said anything to me about it). Two, posted signs don't carry legal weight in most states. You can carry in a store with a no-weapons sign all day long in most parts, and the most they can do is ask you to leave. If you don't leave, it becomes trespassing. Nothing to do with the actual firearm itself.Am I mistaken, I thought Target Stores had signs advising NO Firearms are allowed on their premises? Is that a regional thing?