Recent content by ACJL

He told Bryan Dassey he could kill someone and get away with it.

Some of those questions can't be answered with a definitive answer, only with a speculative answer. Also notice on page 1 it states "We reserve the right to make the final determinations as to whether anyone has successfully answered all 100 questions and is entitled to the $10,000 reward." So...

You presented good arguments. I enjoyed reading your posts. You may not see them often, but there are definitely guilters on here. You'll be missed by them if ur truly gone.

73 is wrong. It wasn't unidentified... it was "insufficient for interpretation". Could've been anyone's blood. And 92 is not entirely right either. She should've said 40%-60% and I believe more than 1 tooth was rebuild.

This test is kinda dumb. There is no definite correct answer to most questions. For example, you can answer question #3, but nobody knows if that is the right answer. So Zellner can just disagree with your answer if she feels like it, if you know what I mean. Back when this came out I think...

Steven has been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and one of the reasons for that is there was no evidence of "shady characters with strong motive to get back at SA". All evidence points to him and him alone, even after the umteenth motion of Zellner.

Welcome! Yep, which is a shame. This is a case that could create many great discussions, but that actually rarely happens.

Not at all. Guilters don't need straws. There's plenty of evidence and if that red fluid was blood that would just fit perfectly with every other piece of evidence there is, such as a nearby bullet with Halbach's DNA on it, nearby burned cremains, Dasseys drawing which marked the spot where she...

I'm getting real. You're the one who dismisses the possibility it's blood without offering any plausible reason. I see you're now saying it could be blood but it would be from an animal. It sounds more plausible to you that now all of a sudden there was an animal bleeding in the garage on the...

It was never proven it wasn't blood. It's not a fact. Even at trial Brendan maintained, under oath, it could've been blood. Can't be ruled out. Which parts of the new information eliminate Steven as a suspect?

Brendan explained he made sure he didn't touch the "red fluid"

Didn't John Ertl actually say he could do it? Because neither blood nor transmission fluid was on the jeans it means it wasn't blood?

That's not really a proper argument to say anything about what the red fluid could've or couldn't have been. It certainly does not rule out blood. Brendan Dassey swore under oath that it could've been blood. His other story was that it could've been a red car fluid (transmission fluid), that got...

What perplexes you about the key? All previous seven "searches" weren't really searches, but rather entries. For example the first entry was just a quick look inside the trailer to see if Teresa was there. You're not gonna find a key hidden behind a record cabinet like that. Another time they...

Actually, addressing another scenario says nothing about reasonable observation about the one you present. Do you know how much blood Marlene Kraintz put in the vial btw? None of the comments you have left so far on the forum show any signs of you even remotely considering the fact Avery could...