These are great!! :floorlaugh::floorlaugh: You can almost HEAR JM making these comments!!!
And then it's, Nurmi to the rescue....never waste an excuse for a mistrial, regardless how ridiculous!! :facepalm:
Thanks!
:rockon:
The difficulty for the DT is that although angry OUTBURST are symptomatic, planning to kill someone for a week is definitely not. BPD does not = insanity (as in right v. wrong).
If Jodi really is a Borderline, she's REALLY going to wish for the DP compared to living in solitary confinement...
I'm sure it's already been posted but the news is JA's DT is now pursuing the mental health angle; that JA has BPD and it's cruel to execute a mentally ill person, asking the prosecutor to take the DP off the table.
Great comment!! I've been astounded, confused AND amused reading this thread as all the "Armchair Psychologist" define, diagnoses and occasionally offer an elixir for not just Jodi, but all of US with MH issues.
The answer to your question could just as easily be that Jodi HAS NO MH issues...
Hi, TIA for all your time in answering our questions!
I'm curious about the issue of lack of remorse. I understand there was a motion filed previously where JSS ruled it would be decided after(?) the guilt phase, or perhaps during the trial. Given JA never actually said the words she was...
Could be all the negative kick back at the Foreman. Perhaps he's also watching/reading finding out more of what he didn't know...buyer's remorse (hopefully).
I agree in part. I wondered why JM didn't make more of Stabby's admitted threat to "expose" TA (to his Church?). As we don't know what the context of the 5/26 text was, to me this fits perfectly, except now she has the sex tape.
This would totally fit with her jealous, stalking behavior and...
Good Morning and TIA for your help!
I'm trying to understand what evidence is allowed in this new sentencing trial. I'm confused by ALL the evidence presented in the guilt phase as opposed to evidence of the crime itself.
Is there a distinction and are there general rules that apply? I...
Maybe OT but I'm wondering if we know what Stabby's portion of the May 26th text msg was? Travis referred to her apologizing but I don't recall ever seeing anything previous to his portion. Did I miss something?
I think it must be a generational thing, yes mine being the old one, but isn't a 'love sac' a bean bag chair, usually found in someone like my 15 yr old daughter's room????
I would be very concerned if my 25 yr old daughter wanted to go shopping for a "love sac"! Really.
:facepalm:
"...did Mr Foreman genuinely think that his comments were not going to invite some response?"
Well, if he did, it goes to show how truly wrong you can be twice in one week!
:facepalm:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.