Recent content by browneyes

I don’t blame him one bit. But his testimony was corroborated by Pecker. They even provided two written documents about the illegal plan, which the defense foolishly refused to try and explain Trump’s side. <modsnip>

Can you provide some links for your assertions?

Why did they HAVE to believe it? The judge instructed them that they did not have to find any witness credible.

The prosecutor also brilliantly went over the details of the 96 second call and it took just over 40 seconds.

<modsnip: Quoted post was removed due to no link> This is why Trump was charged with a Felony. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/05/30/trump-convicted-here-are-the-election-and-tax-laws-he-was-charged-with-breaking/?sh=fe123feaf1e5

I quite enjoyed his interview. I’d be pissed too if Trump had me do his dirty work, cut me loose, and I was the only one sent to prison. He admitted his guilt many times in the interview.

But it’s not an opinion. It was stated very clearly in the jury instructions….confirmed twice by the judge and also by the prosecutor.

I heard it will not be disclosed. It was a guilty/not guilty form. The judge covered this twice as did the prosecutor.

To pay off a woman you had sex with and hide it from everyone….which benefitted his campaign. It’s illegal.

I knew by the notes yesterday, that Trump was in trouble. Especially when they wanted headphones and laptops for each juror. They focused on the important conversations…Pecker and Cohen. Trump’s team put up zero defense to even suggest the situation was different/misrepresented. Of course...

<modsnip: Quoted post was removed> ... the corroboration was to bury the Stormy Daniels’s issue. They played recordings of Trump discussing it with Pecker and Cohen. The NDA was not what the felony charge was.

Where are you Samantha?

Sincerely, what bias? And how does it relate to appellate issues? TIA

I don’t know much about the jury selection in this case, but did the defense oppose any of the final 12?

It does not matter. It was a criminal case, not a political one. So glad the jurors understood this.