Recent content by cody100

Well, I don't for one moment think the SBI will sweep this under the rug. They will report their findings as they are. Now what JS does with it, I have no opinion. I am expecting the report to show misconduct but how that impacted the decision, I can not say. And of course, this is all my...

Well, this type of investigation would most likely get top priority. What would make anyone think JS does not command speedy resolve to this issue? I would think he wants the truth and a quick resolution to the issue at hand. MOO

South has nothing to do with this. It is a very serious allegation. If there were nothing to it, it would already be resolved. The SBI is extremely thorough and this probably could take a while to completely investigate. I had wanted this to be a clean verdict without any questions of...

I think I will wait for the SBI investigation before I make any predictions on mistrial or appeals. Particularly since it is taking so long.

I think the police work on this case, including the SBI and FBI, was outstanding. Most people have no idea how many hours are spent at the crime scene, investigatory work, laboratory work, and even the DA's office. Remember that the puzzle they put together for us was in bits and pieces with...

If this was simply a nut case on FB, then this incident would now be over with. IMO The longer this takes, the more serious I think we can assume this situation might be. Of course, that is my opinion. Personally, I think any communication with the outside regarding the trial and...

I agree, Talina. It will be investigated by the SBI if it refers to a juror after the jury selection was in place. I guess I assumed it was since it came right before the jury voting alleged leaks. My head is spinning too. LOL I am going to go eat and watch ACC basketball.

Here is the link to the statements made on FB. I am referring to the first comment made about seeing one of jurors out at a restaurant or somewhere and they talked about it. Another poster talks about the jury count during deliberations. So, do you mean that first comment refers to juror that...

I thought that juror was mentioned also in this same FB posting. I could be wrong, and thanks for point that out. Perhaps we should clarify that by looking back at the posting on the FB.

I have to say I did find humor that it was the hairdresser. Of course, we know that is a hot bed of gossip. The sides were wrong, but those numbers were dead on, 7 to 4, and 9 to 3. With the 9 to 3 they did get the 9 guilty but said 3 NG. We will see when the SBI finishes its results...

Here is the link: http://www.wral.com/specialreports/michelleyoung/story/10822718/

I think we all should. Where is that link?

I just read the article and am well aware of what she said. It contradicts her earlier statements in her own words during a second interview. <modsnip>

You are so correct. I just have seen the News and Observer repeatedly distort facts. I am not sure if that is a live interview with her or a taped interview that I saw on television. In light of the more serious allegations of jury misconduct, using silence against JY pales in comparison if...

To be honest, I would tend personally to believe television over News and Observer. I have seen the newspaper distort facts right in front of them.