Same. I think only one former poster, who many here respect, made a claim about a gun existing.
He had good research but I am not sure if there's truth to this claim. Nor how he would find out about it if he wasn't LE himself.
Why was a multi-offender felon given a really low bond to go talk to cops about this case and this case only? One that was linked to Suzie via Recla/Clay?
After having an illegal firearm to boot...?
No I just add more because I don't want to keep posting back to back. It's not a big deal and I'm never lying. The only non-fact I ever stated was Culley's/Community center. And I happily owned up to it. The other things are directly from Mike's posts.
How can truth come from retracted and opposing statements?
Mike will gain a lot more credibility when he discusses his relationship with Garrison and how he and his friends became to know him.
Dusty is directly connected.
Mike bought weed off him.
Garrison had weapons around Mike, and the...
Did he lie about Bartt? You're conflating agenda with truth.
Bartt admitted to being hammered. Asher said "sloshed" so where was the lie?
On the topic of mentioning Joe... maybe the "tabloid show" edited it out. Exclusion isn't a lie. And you don't know what was said off camera.
Not even once.
Bartt said he never seen info one way or another.
Ms. Clay is sticking with Mike's story.
No answers on why ex-detectives on the case are wrong but Clay is right.
Where was I hostile? Because I want to know the truth between Asher and Clay's opposing statements?
I have two emails pending with LE and I hope to god they respond about the car. I will be posting to the forum asap when they do. And I have footage of Asher in the message.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.