According to this article, the data that was manipulated included specifying impossible criteria for donor characteristics for particular patients (such as “liver donor must be a 300 lb toddler”), effectively eliminating ANY possibility that the patient would ever be chosen for transplant. The patient would be on the transplant list and would believe themselves to be waiting for a possible donor, but given the impossible criteria specified on their record, there would NEVER be an acceptable donor organ for that patient.
The motive for the alleged data manipulation is unknown.
arstechnica.com
This is a truly terrible betrayal, if it has been accurately presented. Patients would have been led to believe they were among those approved to be waiting for a donor when in fact there could not possibly be a donor who would match the criteria specified in association with them. They were effectively EXCLUDED from the list by the criteria specified.
While of course necessary, offering patients the service of helping them find another transplant program does not return the months or years and the quality of health lost to the time some of them were on the list with no chance they’d find a donor, courtesy of this betrayal. According to the article, some of these patients died while in that state of betrayal.
Assuming the manipulation has been accurately reported, this seems very serious medical malpractice.
HOW could this manipulation of criteria NOT have been detected before now?