Search results

BBM Agree!

THAT is the truth! Nothing; absolutely nothing. The way LE want it, IMO.

ETA: I read W/S *more* than any other site; on many cases. Ask Tricia. For 1st time in years,in early 2015 Iogged in to post on an famous SA Olympic murder - and backed off as it was tense, but found a 2year old urgent PM from T LOL!! so I read and respect every opinion. Of course I judge; I...

My bad. The "be OK with you" meant GENERAL AUDIENCE. Thanks for bringing that to my attention! I should have typed "Would that be OK". Sincere, genuine apologies. Geez. My head's so red from my own slaps.

Yep. True. Aside from human trail...my guess would/could be gunshot residue. Interesting. What if any human scent trail stopped in the parking lot? What if no scent was picked up? Does that ever happen? No clue ???

Bows my head in shame.Never been to Texas. Would *love* to see the Heart of the USA, for want of a personal take and an expression :) Enjoyed 7 trips to USA, Florida, Minnesota, NY and it always rained - and East Coast. I think this crime is so well planned it had to include a team; just like...

Oh my goodness, have you not opened a fresh can of worms! YES! perhaps, who knows, maybe ? What *if* A was seeing C and D was pushing Missy (B) for facts and to try and fix it all, B took pics and A and C retaliated. well! I actually never thought that as a possibility. Again, boils down to...

So well said! I cannot argue your sensible, logical rationale. Thanks!!! However, please do take on board....we may not simply exclude "female relationships" with BB,especially as SW stated "marriage relationships"...plural; 2 in a marriage. SW did not state "Missy had a relationship" only...

I think the "right"is a norm. I think we all have different views; I made particular note of adding JMO,or example olnly in bold,too, and was still questioned. fact remains, I think we should (or may) do well to collectively agree as adults all (relevant) posts, that include "what if, who is to...

MOST welcome! Good to know :)

Aahhh! That bold part above, makes sense *if* 1or 2 accomplices knew. This is all theory, I know. However, taking a theory through logic (in real life) gives rise to reasonable argument. So (for example)1st perp commits crime; 2nd Perp lookout/acts like CG-er-getaway-whatever; if a 3rd party...

Good thought - at least that didn't cross my mind: "could have seen perp on the phone". I ask as I feel accomplices were present at the scene. Could be wrong; it's just a guess.

No idea. However, they were all deleted. Good question. :)

To stage/make murder look like burglary?

At the church. Day of murder. :)

Nice thought! Be interested to know if you think/wonder if there may have been more than one perp involved *that morning*, limaes?

With K9 dogs, seems a gun may have been used. This may have sped up psychopath SwatPerp's 'time' or window of opportunity. LE have said little. My guess is, they'd not have sent in those dogs if there was not a valid reason to do so. Fact? We simply do not know. If true, seems anyone...

Good! Thank you for the heads-up. Taking screenshot with my reply ... as a reminder :)

Indeed. Thank you! :) Phew! I do think most of us here really do understand LE in that at this point in time, all those listed on SWs are not suspects - that is: ALL names we were provided on the first SW dump. Perhaps some folk are not happy LE has removed them, not included others or not...

My wording and going by repeated posts via Tricia/WS. BB is a victim and you're right: LE advised all people listed in SWs are not suspects (at this time). As arkansismimi mentioned after your comment, to another poster, it's a "blanket statement". Thanks.