Search results

Found this in the Gawker comments on a post related to the Grand Jury indictment: Seems plausible to me.

Linda Arndt has claimed that she knows who the killer is and that they will never be prosecuted. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y52_gRlI4Ho&feature=youtu.be&t=8m22s How is that possible? What do you believe she knows that would make such a statement true? Also, is it true that she visited...

I used to be a full on "PR did it!" supporter, but when you think long and hard about it, it doesn't really add up. If it's an accident, you call the police. If PR or JR is the intentional culprit, there's just no compelling rationale for why they cover for the other. Again, you call the police...

What if it had been another child instead of JB killed that night? Imagine: What if a friend of JB's had spent the night and ended up dead instead? Do you think the case would've been prosecuted differently? The other family would have surely put some more pressure on the BPD for...

Hypothetical I know, but... What happens when JR dies? Let's assume BR knows nothing. Is the case truly over at that point?

Been trying to reconcile some things about a RDI theory. How could PR kill JBR in cold blood? What would drive her to it? How was JR involved and at what stage did he decide to cover/go along with it. A possible solution: PR catches JR 'in the act' and becomes enraged. PR is afraid of...

If we're all honest with ourselves, the likelihood of this case being 'solved', and by that I mean having a killer(s) identified and prosecuted, is rather minuscule. DNA might do it. A (legitimate) confession probably would. But apart from those, there's virtually nothing more that can be...