Bartholemeus
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,498
- Reaction score
- 21
Here's the link regarding Jim Stanbury being taken off the case:
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/29709275/top-cop-taken-off-cold-case/
My initial thoughts:
You wouldn't remove the head of the taskforce if a breakthrough was imminent. Meaning, nothing is happening. Lot's of investigation and follow up. No real belief results are on the near horizon.
So what reason is there NOT to have a coronial inquest? I had the impression police were arguing they were close to a break through so a coronial inquest shouldn't be held?
Bring on the coronial inquest please.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/29709275/top-cop-taken-off-cold-case/
My initial thoughts:
You wouldn't remove the head of the taskforce if a breakthrough was imminent. Meaning, nothing is happening. Lot's of investigation and follow up. No real belief results are on the near horizon.
So what reason is there NOT to have a coronial inquest? I had the impression police were arguing they were close to a break through so a coronial inquest shouldn't be held?
Bring on the coronial inquest please.