I went back to the Springfield News-Leader and read every article again. Here is the link with all the articles.
http://springfield.news-leader.com/specialreports/threemissingwomen/families060902.html
Also, I agree that the website for missing persons, Charley Project, has the best detailed description of the 3 missing women and what happened that night. The lady who runs Charley Project posts on here often.
One of the things I keep going back to is someone mentioning that Robert Cox possibly worked with Stacy McCall's father. I wish there was some way to verify that. I never thought Stacy was the intended target. I thought it was either someone Sherrill Levitt was dating or possibly someone Suzie Streeter was mixed up with and that Stacy was in the wrong place at the wrong time. But then if Stacy McCall was the target, it would make more sense for someone to get her when she was alone. So I'm kind of torn on that one, but just the fact that Robert Cox might have worked with Stuart McCall could mean something. Also, I thought maybe someone followed Stacy and Suzie back to Suzie's house and waited for a while because it sounds like they had washed their faces and changed their clothes and everyone was in bed before the abduction. But I don't think anyone followed them there because it sounded like whatever happened was planned out well in advance. It was even mentioned in one of the articles that Sherrill's dog, Cinnamon was outside and someone possibly used the dog as an excuse to gain entry to the house.
The other thing that puzzles me is one of the articles that mentioned the green van. It says that a woman was sitting on her porch watching the sunrise on the morning of June 7, when a similarly described green van pulled into the driveway of the house next door. A blonde who looked like Suzie, and who looked frightened, was driving and some guy got out and went to the porch of that house. The lady heard him to say "don't do anything stupid" to the blonde who was driving. The lady didn't realize until several days afterwards that the blonde looked like Suzie and the van was the one police were looking for. She didn't call authorities right away because she was afraid...and by the time she did, it sounded like the police dismissed it as a meaningless lead. Why did the van stop at that house? Did the perps live there?? Did they know someone who lived there? Did the police talk to anyone who lived in that house? Or was nothing ever followed up on this because the police considered the lead to mean nothing? Another possible lead with the van sounded suspicious too when a guy who saw it in a parking lot, wrote down the license and then decided to throw it away because he decided it didn't mean anything???
In the letters Robert Cox wrote he mentioned 2 other names. One was Dennis Graves and the other was someone named Steve. He mentioned Steve's name when he wondered if Steve had been interrogated like he had. Who are these 2 other people? Were the names Dennis Graves or "Steve" ever connected to this case as possible suspects?? Cox mentioned other names in his letters but they were all LE people or members of the news media. I believe those other 2 names mentioned could have been possible suspects.
Forgive me for just thinking out loud and not really saying anything worthwhile about this but the whole thing makes absolutely no sense. It's got coverup written all over it but it still seems like it could be solved. In one of the articles, it says 48 Hours did a story about it in September 1992. I think it's time they or Dateline NBC or Court TVs Under Investigation or SOMEONE does an updated story on this.