sleutherontheside
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 9,874
- Reaction score
- -2
I think that a lot of people are putting too much emphasis on the importance of JT's written statement. His statement is not so crucial that if it is discredited, it would impact the trial. It may serve to support a "timeline" presented by the SA, but I doubt that anything hinges on it. As experts will testify to a timeframe that death likely occurred, the SA will likely offer this witness testimony as supporting a sighting of Caylee as of a certain date. His claims may be discredited, but they have been made AND he has given a sworn statement.
I think that speculation into conversations that could have occurred, questioning her need for a monitor, etc....may be overanalyzing this statement. I think its' relevence is nothing more than an opportunity to support a timeframe in this case. Often a witness will take their oath, be asked one question, give a brief answer, and then thanked for their time. Put enough of those brief statements together, and you have supporting testimony to add credibility to your claim as it may be.
I think that speculation into conversations that could have occurred, questioning her need for a monitor, etc....may be overanalyzing this statement. I think its' relevence is nothing more than an opportunity to support a timeframe in this case. Often a witness will take their oath, be asked one question, give a brief answer, and then thanked for their time. Put enough of those brief statements together, and you have supporting testimony to add credibility to your claim as it may be.