hey guys
I am sitting on my hands. Truthfully. And, boy do I ever understand the temptation to respond to OT...uh... chit-chat.<pun intended>
However, this thread is near and dear to me --- almost sacred. :angel:
I honestly feel that this thread contains some of the best work ever done by Ws'ers as far as leading us down the path to finding out what really happened to precious 2 1/2 yr. old Caylee, whom we all have grown to love.
I am certainly no mod, just someone who cares alot about protecting the integrity of this thread. So, I would much appreciate it if we can try not to 'contaminate the scene', so to speak.
Sorry if I am coming across as bossy, I don't mean to. I just really want to respect the hard work that so many people have invested.
cry: x 100), at that point she likely tore the rest of the pieces at one time. I mean, after all, even KC could see at that point that she was going to need MORE tape to finish off her mission. (omg, i never use the word 'hate', but it is dangerously close to rolling off of my tongue right now :furiousI wish I had a better description of where Q62 was on the skull. I think if it were on top of (and especially if it were underneath) Q64-Q63, it would have had the same big bulge seen in those pieces, and probably would have been removed and photographed as a "set" like they were. My guess, based on the flatness and longer length of that piece, is that it went from ear to ear across the nose.On a small skull with no nose, that positioning could easily be described as being in the "mouth area" as reported at the scene, and also as being over the "nasal apertures" as reported by the ME.
Now, that my mind is a teeny-bit fresher and I have had a chance to study your posts - thank you soooo much for your observations and the time you have put into this! The process of elimination will eventually get us there.
--all quotes respectfully snipped
At first, it was my mindset that she 'ripped-placed, ripped-placed, ripped-placed' etc...however, after considering your very astute hypothesis and other posters' experiences, my mind is wide-open that if she did come back to find Caylee had thwarted her plans
I asked Bond this privately a while ago, but I'm gonna put it out here for input - It makes logical sense that the evidence (Q#'s) were assigned in sequence, as the ME removed the tape (e.g., Q62 would be removed before Q63, Q64, etc...). I briefly re-read the autopsy report to see if it shed any light, but found nothing specific to substantiate that. (Maybe there is another report that I missed. :waitasec: ) So, I assume, but don't really know if Q62 would have been removed first. IOW, that doesn't mean at all that Q62 had to be on top of the tangled Q63/Q64 pieces, but it was probably removed first from some place on Caylee's face. Does that make sense?
Here is a printscreen of it:
That roll of tape is HUGE and much more tape left on it than I expected.
No clue why I had any expectations, though.
I only wish we could SEE the torn end!!!:banghead:
Patience, beach....patience. I know we WILL find it.
Here is a printscreen of it:
I am a bit embarrassed to say it, but it was quite interesting and very educational. That said, it wasn't a Henkel factory and didn't show logos. But it documented exactly in a video format how it is rolled, cut and packaged.
