BringKyronHome
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2010
- Messages
- 190
- Reaction score
- 0
Q: Can you describe how Terri Horman handled the polygraph requests? I believe you have said to others that Terri walked out of a second polygraph, and then waited about 10 days before taking a third? Can you clarify this for us?
A: She fully cooperated and took the first polygraph then subsequently vented her failed results to all family, friends, and law enforcement at the house. A few days later she cooperated and went to take a second polygraph test but got up and walked out before the machine portion of the test could be administered... again by her own statement to family, friends, and law enforcement at the house ...She continually pushed back and refused to repeat the second test for several days (approx. 8-10) before going to take the test and then once again coming back to the house and venting to all listeners.
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/07/kaine_horman_describes_how_ter.html
I believe that this 2nd time, when she walked out is the time that she was interoggated for 6 hours on one question, broke down & left (before the poly was administered).
...putting comments from Mr. Moulton, Finster, Cook and Kaine together.
And if that's what happened, I would have walked out too, and it would have taken alot to get me back there. This is the point at which she should have used that statement mentioned above!
But that would have made her look more guilty, hmmmmmmmm....
Anyway, we have only Terri's word as told to us by Kaine, based on what LE told her about her results.
She could have failed, she could have come up elusive on ONE question, the one that she was grilled on for 6 hours, or she could have passed it.
LE knows that good liars can pass and truthtellers can fail. They could have told her anything to further their investigation.
Furthermore, she could have been called back to answer additional questions that were not originally asked.
So to answer the question: NO!
But I also think it's important to consider that we don't know anything about the results...so weighing whether a failed results may indicate something could be a moot point.