JerseyGirl said:
Of course he is on the list of possible suspects. problem is, he may well spend the rest of his life on that list. As most police will tell you, no one is ever cleared of a crime until someone else has been charged with it.
Evidence
- Thread starter Timex
- Start date
New Posts
-
UK - Constance Marten & Mark Gordon charged, Newborn (found deceased), Bolton Greater Manchester, 5 Jan 2023 #7- Latest: Observant-ADHD-ENFP-BSc
-
OH OH - Toledo, WhtFem 16-21, 335UFOH, burned, 5 pearl studs per ear, Jun'87- Latest: HmmMysterious
-
NM NM - Ingrid Lane, 37, Jemez Springs, 15 Oct 2023
- Latest: Protectwomenandgirls
- Status
Of course he is on the list of possible suspects. problem is, he may well spend the rest of his life on that list. As most police will tell you, no one is ever cleared of a crime until someone else has been charged with it.
:snooty: Just like this....CONFIRMED. Really, I'm not trying to argue but, just what is the norm here. And to all those who state that they think it wasn't appropriate...how many of you have had your wife murdered? And even then...who make judgements on something like that? Come on.Timex said:
lauriej
'wild rose country...'
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 4,412
- Reaction score
- -246
........i have to say, i've only been to 3 funerals in my life, ( of people VERY near and dear to me..) thinking back...........i was unconsolable, ( when the pall bearers walked off with the casket.........etc..) laughed..and cried ...at the reception after, as stories were told of the deceased.....Timex said:
...i hadn't really slept in a week.....emotions are weird under those circumstances.....
...what IS appropriate funeral behaviour ? i don't think there is such a thing, universally.......
Im not arguing with you...I agree to a point. I based my post on what someone else that attended the funeral reported. Thats all we can go on. Now we have one saying he acted appropriately, and one saying he didnt, so its a matter of interpritation. But, that said, I do think there are certain things one should or should not do at a funeral or memorial.
LvsAMystry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2003
- Messages
- 1,189
- Reaction score
- 3,404
Rooster,
Thanks for answering so many of our questions as best you can. It's great for us to be able to confirm as much as possible. I also think many of us have more of an open mind with respect to this case than you think.
With that said, you've answered so many specific questions, but I'd love if you can answer one of a speculative nature. I know you feel Raven is innocent and isn't the one that murdered Janet, and I respect that, so who, in your gut, do you think did it and why?
Thanks for answering so many of our questions as best you can. It's great for us to be able to confirm as much as possible. I also think many of us have more of an open mind with respect to this case than you think.
With that said, you've answered so many specific questions, but I'd love if you can answer one of a speculative nature. I know you feel Raven is innocent and isn't the one that murdered Janet, and I respect that, so who, in your gut, do you think did it and why?
I think many have an open mind, but that said, many have made up their mind. And there is nothing wrong with them doing so. It just means there are going to be different interpritations of the same evidence. What one sees as "inappropriate", another may see as perfectly normal. It's going to happen. And sadly, it is going to hurt people on both sides. This is why I always say family and friends should really think carefully before reading these forums.
I don't know who.LvsAMystry said:
But I have theory...I think someone was watching her and the house, with intention's to rape her.(I hate even typing this...it make's me sick.) They waited until Raven left to his game. Now keep in mind if they had been watching the house they probably knew if they saw Raven leave in his Soccer clothes, with his soccer bag. (don't know if he had one...I'm just speculating.) Then they would know they had (however long), as long as a soccer game take's, to do what they intended. I think Janet fought the rapest/murder and he killed her. I think maybe he was only intending to rape. But ended up killing her because she fought back.
He then probably ran...
This is all theory.
helloyellow
New Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2005
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
Wouldn't that have been messy......in the sense of leaving evidence?Rooster said:I don't know who.
I think Janet fought the rapest/murder and he killed her. I think maybe he was only intending to rape. But ended up killing her because she fought back.
He then probably ran...
This is all theory.
Yeah, I'm sure. But Raven may have smuged fingerprints or gotten Janet's blood where the murderer had already dripped blood. Who know's. Hopefully when all the testing is done there will be some hard DNA evidance against the murderer.helloyellow said:
Or at least something to go on.
I think we sometimes forget that in many, many cases there is little or no physical evidence left behind. We live in a world of CSI type shows, which leads us to believe there is always something that science can use to solve these cases, when the reality is, often there is nothing science can do. I can think of at least 3 cases Ive followed have had NO physical evidence, even though a stranger entered a home and committed a serious crime.
lauriej
'wild rose country...'
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 4,412
- Reaction score
- -246
...i think, if someone had intentions to rape..( and IMO that takes a seriously disturbed person) ...and for whatever reasons didn't get to carry that out........
...that their rage would then be INCREASED...and we'd see NUMEROUS stab wounds , acting out their frustration.....and not just the 3.....
...( of course, we don't KNOW there were just the one to the shoulder....one to the hand.....fatal one to the chest.....) but based on what we've heard.....
...that their rage would then be INCREASED...and we'd see NUMEROUS stab wounds , acting out their frustration.....and not just the 3.....
...( of course, we don't KNOW there were just the one to the shoulder....one to the hand.....fatal one to the chest.....) but based on what we've heard.....
lauriej
'wild rose country...'
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 4,412
- Reaction score
- -246
Unless, he DIDN'T necessarily WANT to murder her and when he saw that he did he ran. Maybe the motive was only rape. ???Rooster said:I don't know who.
I think Janet fought the rapest/murder and he killed her. I think maybe he was only intending to rape. But ended up killing her because she fought back.
He then probably ran...
This is all theory.
______________________________________________________________
.......if someone had been watching the house/her.............intentions to rape........had determined how long they had time-wise to do so.......
...then i would say that they would carry it out..........
...and THEN in the aftermath, t(he stab wounds, whether he wanted to murder her or not, then ran.).......
...IMO, a rapist stalking someone with intent to rape..........will.....and we've heard nothing to back up that.........i don't think it was a would-be stalker/rapist.....
lauriej
'wild rose country...'
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 4,412
- Reaction score
- -246
..............agreed.......'not random' , we've come to know means janet was the intended victim..........Tammie63 said:
...if someone was stalking her...........was her husband gone routinely at night ? how would they know "that night" was an opputune time ?
...if someone was stalking her..............would LE lead the public to think they had nothing to fear ?
...if raven isn't a POI........( and LE hasn't been clear on that one way or the other......................although 47 days later he's not been arrested....) then WHO is ? personally, if i lived in durham NC right now.................with the lack of news.............i'd be concerned.........
- Status