SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 76
My opinions only, no facts here:
I was not presenting a new hypothesis, just pointing out that we cannot rule out that Michelle was grabbed after leaving the daycare. This is the earliest in my timeline that she could have been kidnapped. If Michelle was kidnapped near the daycare center, it would NOT be a random act, since the young boys with her did not also disappear.
Of course it is more likely that she made it to the ex-boyfriend's house. But who saw her come into or leave that neighborhood? Yes, there is a Hummer, but who was in it?
Tho, I'm not certain this would solve anything.. Even if what you're proposing is true it stiil doesnt take the direction away from Dale.. all roads still lead to him as the responsible indidvidual.. Reason being is that "if" it were that she met with foul play prior to ever arriving at Dales{before or immediately after daycare} then it is not logical that Dale would find it necessary to lie and state that Michelle was ever at his condo that day.. We know this is what Dale claims in that Michelle came to his condo to drop off twins..If she'd already met with foul play{before/after daycare}then Dale Smith never in a million years would have ever stated that Michelle was there if she really wasn't.. Never..
Therefor for me, personally if it were found that she was harmed before ever reaching Dale's condo to drop off twins it still leads directly to DaleII being responsible as there is just no way he'd have made himself the last person to have seen Michelle..UNLESS HE TRULY WAS THE LAST ONE TO SEE MICHELLE!.. Nope.. either way all the roads still lead directly to him..jmo, tho!.
Originally Posted by GrammaMaybe
I'm having difficulty figuring out how to deal with knowing "that which must not be known" and am wondering what the rules are about this. Information presented by MSM was snatched by LE and IMHO(H=humble) obfuscation provided as cover. Now when erroneous info is presented in this forum what is one to do? Ignore it and let all the good minds who are here stray into the hinterlands of superfluous conjecture? Gently suggest that the poster is in error and present fantastic reasons <Mod Snip>
Input requested.
I interpreted this the exact same as nobodynoz did.. So, really wish you would elaborate exactly what "it" is that you are speaking of in the above snipped quote..
Not sure if you had seen Kimb's reply(posted below) as she explains easily how to remedy the issue of which you speak.. Meaning that tho you're possibly privy to knowing details that we do not know.. This easy way is to just post it and if no link to verify iT then you can post it and technically it be just your opinion.(refer to kimb's post below).. I know many of us would be very interested for you to expand on the topic thats laid out in your post above..tia
If you have come to a conclusion regarding this case, you should share your theory. We have all been influenced by the information published by MSM and LE. If you don't have MSM to back up your theory, state that on your post. It's speculation regardless how you came to that conclusion, JMO!