catswhiskers
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,575
- Reaction score
- 22
I can see that the lake would be an ideal focus for many - it's a defined area and who knows what secrets are submerged in its depths. But in a wilderness area is it really the only possibility, or the most likely to be chosen by a predator/killer? The number of other areas that are off the beaten track and rarely, if ever visited by others would be huge IMO. The lake would almost be too obvious in comparison I think.
On the other hand I can also see why LE could almost downplay any suspicions they might have about the lake, and even the hits from dogs, until they can actually access the lake. Perhaps it's out of kindness to the family (who are already suffering unimaginably I know)?? It seems cruel to tell any family that they think they know where their loved one is, but they will have to wait months to confirm until warmer temperatures allow them to dive.
LE may even be worried that the public would be whipped into even more of a frenzy and take matters into their own hands - not only with regards to the person they believe is responsible, but also by attempting to access the lake themselves or something like that?
:moo:
On the other hand I can also see why LE could almost downplay any suspicions they might have about the lake, and even the hits from dogs, until they can actually access the lake. Perhaps it's out of kindness to the family (who are already suffering unimaginably I know)?? It seems cruel to tell any family that they think they know where their loved one is, but they will have to wait months to confirm until warmer temperatures allow them to dive.
LE may even be worried that the public would be whipped into even more of a frenzy and take matters into their own hands - not only with regards to the person they believe is responsible, but also by attempting to access the lake themselves or something like that?
:moo: