elmomom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,491
- Reaction score
- 8,115
11/27/2012 REL - Reply - Party (001) 11/28/2012
NOTE: REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO STATES NOTICE REGARDING REVIEW OF HARD DRIVE BY DEFENDANT AND HER COUNSEL
11/27/2012 NOT - Notice - Party (001) 11/28/2012
NOTE: REGARDING REVIEW OF HARD DRIVE BY DEFENDANT AND HER COUNSEL
11/26/2012 RES - Response - Party (001) 11/26/2012
NOTE: DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S NOTICE REGARDING REVIEW OF HARD DRIVE BY DEFENDANT AND HER COUNSEL
11/21/2012 005 - ME: Hearing - Party (001) 11/21/2012
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CR2008
-
031021
-
001 DT
11/19/2012
Docket Code 005
Form R000D
Page
2
IT IS ORDERED State shall have the Detective take the States hard drive to Defense counsel to review at 10:00 a.m. on November 20, 2012.
12/4 Minutes:
Counsel for the Defendant makes an oral Motion for an ex parte sealed hearing regarding the computer hard drive.
IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion.
Can you tell me what was sealed in this motion? Lots of folks believe that Jodi's computer hard drive was ruled to be not admitted as evidence, do any if our legal observers know if that is true? Thanks!:seeya:
NOTE: REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO STATES NOTICE REGARDING REVIEW OF HARD DRIVE BY DEFENDANT AND HER COUNSEL
11/27/2012 NOT - Notice - Party (001) 11/28/2012
NOTE: REGARDING REVIEW OF HARD DRIVE BY DEFENDANT AND HER COUNSEL
11/26/2012 RES - Response - Party (001) 11/26/2012
NOTE: DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S NOTICE REGARDING REVIEW OF HARD DRIVE BY DEFENDANT AND HER COUNSEL
11/21/2012 005 - ME: Hearing - Party (001) 11/21/2012
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
CR2008
-
031021
-
001 DT
11/19/2012
Docket Code 005
Form R000D
Page
2
IT IS ORDERED State shall have the Detective take the States hard drive to Defense counsel to review at 10:00 a.m. on November 20, 2012.
12/4 Minutes:
Counsel for the Defendant makes an oral Motion for an ex parte sealed hearing regarding the computer hard drive.
IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion.
Can you tell me what was sealed in this motion? Lots of folks believe that Jodi's computer hard drive was ruled to be not admitted as evidence, do any if our legal observers know if that is true? Thanks!:seeya: