*graphic and adult content* Jodi Arias Trial media/ timeline thread **no discussion**

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Deanna Reid is being called backup to the stand . . .JA is now putting her glasses on the very tip of her nose and reading over the op of them (the old librarian look). .she is writing notes to JW

Stand for the jury - JA whispering in JW ear.

Nurmi cross examine Deanna

your relationship with TA - met him in 1998, she was 20 y/o @ the time. He was 1 year older than she. She met him thru mutual friends - he was @ her apartment with her roommates and she came home and was introduced to her.

both members of the LDS church.
church Wards - same one as TA and same church

membership in church - parents joined when she was 1 y/o she grew up in the church. TA's family members were members of the church but were not active in the church - his grandparents were active members.

began dating TA in 2000....2 years friendship approx. before dating. How did it turn into dating? . . . hang out spend more time with each other, know each other better, liked each other - started dating.
sometimes date in groups and sometimes as couple.

point in time he became boyfriend . .. don't know if pinpoint date and time . . around the spring of 2000. 3 or 4 months of dating . . . prior to Mission in costa rica.

she was 21 when she left on mission.

boyfriend and girlfriend meant dating exclusively . . . anything else?
don't know what you are referring to - we were datin
expectations for the future?
not in beginning -eventually . . . .started thinking about future together more just before I left for Mission in Costa Rica - talked to TA about thoughts and expectations.

there was no set plan when she returned from mission . . . subject of marriage was brought up but she knew she was going to be leaving for long time . .. prior to Mission he never proposed to her or ask her not to go on mission.

DR was gone about 1.5 years - only means of communication was thru letters (per constraints of church mission).

limitation of only writing letters apply to everyone . .allowed to telephone family 2 times per year on Mothers Day and Xmas

One of the letters ta wrote - he was expressing desire to see other people in the letter - pretty significant moment getting that?

I didn't expect him to wait for me butI wouldn't say it wasn't a big deal.

this was well into her mission she was due to return home in just a few months - letter just said date other people - no one specific

doesn't remember number of letters exchanged after that
c
she was in love with him, she was focused on the work she was doing in Costa Rica - there was a distraction

came back 2001 = both DR and TA lived in Riverside . . . about 1 or 2 weeks after she returned from her mission - DR thought he might have moved on . . . she had family stuff going on - she called him when she was ready

do yu know Linda Ballard (?) - yes person TA dated @ time - met her after return from mission.

impression of level of seriousness of their relationship?? didn't know level

saw him as a friend when dr returned home.
began dating him againin 2002 - he became available after he and Linda broke up.
Linda moved out of State

2002 - 2004 exclusive relationship with TA. reason ended - DR wanted to get married.
Nurmi asks to approach.
 
Deanna Reid is being called backup to the stand . . .JA is now putting her glasses on the very tip of her nose and reading over the op of them (the old librarian look). .she is writing notes to JW

Stand for the jury - JA whispering in JW ear.

Nurmi cross examine Deanna

your relationship with TA - met him in 1998, she was 20 y/o @ the time. He was 1 year older than she. She met him thru mutual friends - he was @ her apartment with her roommates and she came home and was introduced to her.

both members of the LDS church.
church Wards - same one as TA and same church

membership in church - parents joined when she was 1 y/o she grew up in the church. TA's family members were members of the church but were not active in the church - his grandparents were active members.

began dating TA in 2000....2 years friendship approx. before dating. How did it turn into dating? . . . hang out spend more time with each other, know each other better, liked each other - started dating.
sometimes date in groups and sometimes as couple.

point in time he became boyfriend . .. don't know if pinpoint date and time . . around the spring of 2000. 3 or 4 months of dating . . . prior to Mission in costa rica.

she was 21 when she left on mission.

boyfriend and girlfriend meant dating exclusively . . . anything else?
don't know what you are referring to - we were datin
expectations for the future?
not in beginning -eventually . . . .started thinking about future together more just before I left for Mission in Costa Rica - talked to TA about thoughts and expectations.

there was no set plan when she returned from mission . . . subject of marriage was brought up but she knew she was going to be leaving for long time . .. prior to Mission he never proposed to her or ask her not to go on mission.

DR was gone about 1.5 years - only means of communication was thru letters (per constraints of church mission).

limitation of only writing letters apply to everyone . .allowed to telephone family 2 times per year on Mothers Day and Xmas

One of the letters ta wrote - he was expressing desire to see other people in the letter - pretty significant moment getting that?

I didn't expect him to wait for me butI wouldn't say it wasn't a big deal.

this was well into her mission she was due to return home in just a few months - letter just said date other people - no one specific

doesn't remember number of letters exchanged after that
c
she was in love with him, she was focused on the work she was doing in Costa Rica - there was a distraction

came back 2001 = both DR and TA lived in Riverside . . . about 1 or 2 weeks after she returned from her mission - DR thought he might have moved on . . . she had family stuff going on - she called him when she was ready

do yu know Linda Ballard (?) - yes person TA dated @ time - met her after return from mission.

impression of level of seriousness of their relationship?? didn't know level

saw him as a friend when dr returned home.
began dating him againin 2002 - he became available after he and Linda broke up.
Linda moved out of State

2002 - 2004 exclusive relationship with TA. reason ended - DR wanted to get married.
Nurmi asks to approach.
 
Mike may have cut out . . . .she wanted to get married when she was about 24 y/o in 2002.

this wasn't a shock to TA -they discussed marriage before - never engaged.
they talked about it.

did he ever tell you he wanted to marry you?
he didn't say it in that way - said she would be a good person to marry but he wasn't ready.

we were in love w/each other, liked each other, time together went by quickly - didn't feel pressure to get married ... eventually she felt like wanting to be married.

it was not overnight . . .. realized how much time had gone by that they dated - didn't see it going that direction - he was not ready @ that point.

that was enough fo you to say I am not hanging out anymore for you to get ready - right?
that is right

broke up with him 2004 - he moved to Mesa you moved to Phoenix
it was in 2005 broke up

move in 2004 still together . . . both moved to az in 2004 - boyfriend and girlfriend when both moved.

when you broke up with TA in2005 did you maintain relationship?
yes we did

period time you separated ?
yes a couple weeks we didn't speak and had time away from each other.

did you and TA have a sexual relationship?
yes we did - dating a long time - we were in love . . .something happens when people are in love - after we had moved to AZ.

this isn't question to judge . .. not what we are talking about . .. lifelong member of the church - sex is inconsistent with dictates of the church
yes
was the fact you having this relationship - kept between 2 of you
that was our private business - we didn't tell people about it

in terms of ramifications within church - did you or TA face ramificatons because of it
no people are just human - people make mistakes - go to Bishop which we did and talked about our relationship - in 2005.

this was in different wards .. . she lived in downtown mesa. . . .had different Bishops - each went individually.

she lost her temple recommend - so did TA

sexual relationship - people make mistakes . . . one time mistake or several times?
objection vaginal intercourse . . .what are we talking about?
sustained

you are familiar with law of chastity - not a vow . .. just rules we live by . . .sometimes we are human we mess up - sometimes people break rules that is what happened.

this law of chastity forbids oral sex, prohibit anal, penile/vaginal intercourse - any type of sexual contact.

one time or happened several times

objection- overruled

you and TA broke the law of chastity broke the law
more than one time - several times

sexual relationship lasted about a year.

talk to the bishop - went separately.
did so with TA's knowledge.
he did so with Deanna's knowledge

you and he had some sort of discussion about goin to see respective bishops in 2005

after broken up?
while still together

after went to bishop - had discussion did you and TA break law of chastity again subsequent to that?
no
 
Mike may have cut out . . . .she wanted to get married when she was about 24 y/o in 2002.

this wasn't a shock to TA -they discussed marriage before - never engaged.
they talked about it.

did he ever tell you he wanted to marry you?
he didn't say it in that way - said she would be a good person to marry but he wasn't ready.

we were in love w/each other, liked each other, time together went by quickly - didn't feel pressure to get married ... eventually she felt like wanting to be married.

it was not overnight . . .. realized how much time had gone by that they dated - didn't see it going that direction - he was not ready @ that point.

that was enough fo you to say I am not hanging out anymore for you to get ready - right?
that is right

broke up with him 2004 - he moved to Mesa you moved to Phoenix
it was in 2005 broke up

move in 2004 still together . . . both moved to az in 2004 - boyfriend and girlfriend when both moved.

when you broke up with TA in2005 did you maintain relationship?
yes we did

period time you separated ?
yes a couple weeks we didn't speak and had time away from each other.

did you and TA have a sexual relationship?
yes we did - dating a long time - we were in love . . .something happens when people are in love - after we had moved to AZ.

this isn't question to judge . .. not what we are talking about . .. lifelong member of the church - sex is inconsistent with dictates of the church
yes
was the fact you having this relationship - kept between 2 of you
that was our private business - we didn't tell people about it

in terms of ramifications within church - did you or TA face ramificatons because of it
no people are just human - people make mistakes - go to Bishop which we did and talked about our relationship - in 2005.

this was in different wards .. . she lived in downtown mesa. . . .had different Bishops - each went individually.

she lost her temple recommend - so did TA

sexual relationship - people make mistakes . . . one time mistake or several times?
objection vaginal intercourse . . .what are we talking about?
sustained

you are familiar with law of chastity - not a vow . .. just rules we live by . . .sometimes we are human we mess up - sometimes people break rules that is what happened.

this law of chastity forbids oral sex, prohibit anal, penile/vaginal intercourse - any type of sexual contact.

one time or happened several times

objection- overruled

you and TA broke the law of chastity broke the law
more than one time - several times

sexual relationship lasted about a year.

talk to the bishop - went separately.
did so with TA's knowledge.
he did so with Deanna's knowledge

you and he had some sort of discussion about goin to see respective bishops in 2005

after broken up?
while still together

after went to bishop - had discussion did you and TA break law of chastity again subsequent to that?
no
 
email from chris Hughes to TA . . . Deanna is reading to herself.

Deanna never saw this email before . ..
said he felt bad for dating her so long this was time in her life she should be getting married an now she is beyond that time for getting married and that is what he felt bad for.

during course of relationship - did he ever have you write letters to male friends saying not friends anymore. . . never asked her to wear an outfit like the French maid outfit.

text message with him in 2005 and up to 2008.

exhibit #391 - JA looking up mouth agape.

you are the ultimate *advertiser censored* in bed . . .
blowin enormous loads every time
ejaculate on your face
call you *advertiser censored*, *advertiser censored*, 3 hole wonder, tie you to tree and "put it in your *advertiser censored*"
NO to all above

must have had a different relationship wit you than JA
objection - lack foundation -

tell you way you moan is like a 12 y/o girl having first orgasm?
no

want to cork the pot of a little girl?
no

you with this man for so many years . ..what did you know?
i knew about his upbringing - it was rough his parents were drug addicts - don't kno which drugs addicted to....I knew some of TA's memories he told me of them
he told me he had not only bad memories but also had good memories of his Mom throwing birthday parties and doing nice things

bad memories stories of neglect and wanting out of the house - poor living conditions.
rat infested, *advertiser censored* roaches - types ofthings seen in his book

what about his Father?
things he told me about his Dad - different memoris - saw avideo ta showd . . .his Dad passed away .
howproud tA wasof his father and how he tried to clean up his life just before he passed.

sisters and brother of TA crying

was his father also neglectful?
yes
physically abusive?
no
his mom physically abusive to TA
no

Deanna met his Mom
ultimate goal when moving back to Riverside in 2008 . . .

she wanted to pursue teaching degree but got bachelors degree in California.

tell yu goal of being teachr was stupid?
no he was very supportive

he had seen me in different teaching situations @ church - he knew I was passionate - he was supportive of me being teach

familiar with Lisa Andrews - he dated, was serious - might go to marriage .
yes

are you familiar with fact he told her being teach stupid
no
guess different relationship
that is all

JM asks last comment stricken

Did you lie to Bishop, or only tell him you were only havng oral sex?
no I told him everything

doyou know ifdefendant was paricipateing in sexual acts?
no idea
did ya tell anyone else about your sex with TA?
no

did he lie to youabout not wanting to marry
no he was very honest

did he ask you for sex after broke up
no
continue t have sex after brea up
no

he was always a gentleman - never pressured me

never asked to have sex with him after broke up

picture of skimpy clothing - know bout that?
no
ejacuilate on his face?
don't know
JA asks for that
didn't know anything about their sex life

anytime verbal, physical abusive,pressure you into something you didn't want,
anytime ever inappropriate with you
NO

one juror question
counsel please approach
 
email from chris Hughes to TA . . . Deanna is reading to herself.

Deanna never saw this email before . ..
said he felt bad for dating her so long this was time in her life she should be getting married an now she is beyond that time for getting married and that is what he felt bad for.

during course of relationship - did he ever have you write letters to male friends saying not friends anymore. . . never asked her to wear an outfit like the French maid outfit.

text message with him in 2005 and up to 2008.

exhibit #391 - JA looking up mouth agape.

you are the ultimate *advertiser censored* in bed . . .
blowin enormous loads every time
ejaculate on your face
call you *advertiser censored*, *advertiser censored*, 3 hole wonder, tie you to tree and "put it in your *advertiser censored*"
NO to all above

must have had a different relationship wit you than JA
objection - lack foundation -

tell you way you moan is like a 12 y/o girl having first orgasm?
no

want to cork the pot of a little girl?
no

you with this man for so many years . ..what did you know?
i knew about his upbringing - it was rough his parents were drug addicts - don't kno which drugs addicted to....I knew some of TA's memories he told me of them
he told me he had not only bad memories but also had good memories of his Mom throwing birthday parties and doing nice things

bad memories stories of neglect and wanting out of the house - poor living conditions.
rat infested, *advertiser censored* roaches - types ofthings seen in his book

what about his Father?
things he told me about his Dad - different memoris - saw avideo ta showd . . .his Dad passed away .
howproud tA wasof his father and how he tried to clean up his life just before he passed.

sisters and brother of TA crying

was his father also neglectful?
yes
physically abusive?
no
his mom physically abusive to TA
no

Deanna met his Mom
ultimate goal when moving back to Riverside in 2008 . . .

she wanted to pursue teaching degree but got bachelors degree in California.

tell yu goal of being teachr was stupid?
no he was very supportive

he had seen me in different teaching situations @ church - he knew I was passionate - he was supportive of me being teach

familiar with Lisa Andrews - he dated, was serious - might go to marriage .
yes

are you familiar with fact he told her being teach stupid
no
guess different relationship
that is all

JM asks last comment stricken

Did you lie to Bishop, or only tell him you were only havng oral sex?
no I told him everything

doyou know ifdefendant was paricipateing in sexual acts?
no idea
did ya tell anyone else about your sex with TA?
no

did he lie to youabout not wanting to marry
no he was very honest

did he ask you for sex after broke up
no
continue t have sex after brea up
no

he was always a gentleman - never pressured me

never asked to have sex with him after broke up

picture of skimpy clothing - know bout that?
no
ejacuilate on his face?
don't know
JA asks for that
didn't know anything about their sex life

anytime verbal, physical abusive,pressure you into something you didn't want,
anytime ever inappropriate with you
NO

one juror question
counsel please approach
 
Law of chastity widely known?
it is
discussed in meetings during week
sometimes there are lessons on Law of Chastiy

what does it forbid or allow
it is clear - does not allow any sexual contact between people whoare not married

is there any wiggle room . . maybe we can do this
no those things may happen if they do happen it is violation of the law of chastity and that is clear

Nurmi -in terms of law chastity . . . someone take picture of penis be in violation of law of chastity . .
don't know specifically but in my opinion yes

close up pics of female genetalia
yes
pic of woman's anus be violation of law of chastity
yes

that s all

next witness
 
Law of chastity widely known?
it is
discussed in meetings during week
sometimes there are lessons on Law of Chastiy

what does it forbid or allow
it is clear - does not allow any sexual contact between people whoare not married

is there any wiggle room . . maybe we can do this
no those things may happen if they do happen it is violation of the law of chastity and that is clear

Nurmi -in terms of law chastity . . . someone take picture of penis be in violation of law of chastity . .
don't know specifically but in my opinion yes

close up pics of female genetalia
yes
pic of woman's anus be violation of law of chastity
yes

that s all

next witness
 
Michael Melendez . . . computer forensic unit - he testified earlier - looked @ TA's laptop computer hard drive - all the data is kept on computer

any indication you unable access all on the hard drive
i was able to look @ everything

photos of women from waist up
did not find any of women's breast
no images whatsoever


search for all types files . . .look @ file headers if file imbedded into another file - like a photo put into a word doc.

none pics of women's breasts
internet history - social media sites,

access toany adult sites?
no d

look @ registry tosee software added - give idea what this usere is doing on computer

software - ie: for check fraud . . . they would be able to do that

on this laptop . . . nothing like that found - just basic windows,

no images of children in that computer

Cross - by Nurmi

remember saying this computer used to watch video @ 4:30 am on 6/4/08?
no I don't
owner of this laptop registred to Deanna reid

Nurmi and JW @ bench - looking for something.
 
Michael Melendez . . . computer forensic unit - he testified earlier - looked @ TA's laptop computer hard drive - all the data is kept on computer

any indication you unable access all on the hard drive
i was able to look @ everything

photos of women from waist up
did not find any of women's breast
no images whatsoever


search for all types files . . .look @ file headers if file imbedded into another file - like a photo put into a word doc.

none pics of women's breasts
internet history - social media sites,

access toany adult sites?
no d

look @ registry tosee software added - give idea what this usere is doing on computer

software - ie: for check fraud . . . they would be able to do that

on this laptop . . . nothing like that found - just basic windows,

no images of children in that computer

Cross - by Nurmi

remember saying this computer used to watch video @ 4:30 am on 6/4/08?
no I don't
owner of this laptop registred to Deanna reid

Nurmi and JW @ bench - looking for something.
 
Below is a news link to JA drawings compare to TA family members. Also, it states the money from sale of drawings is going to JA defense. (I asked permission first before posting this)

it may be possible the drawings are leaving through her attorneys, no one checks attorney client privilege, I don't know if they can leave through the jail.

To me it is wrong to draw the victims family. That is one explanation of why JA keeps looking back at the gallery/family. She may be drawing others such as jury, lawyers, Judge, time will tell.

if someone wants to post entire article please do, I did not want to blow the margins as I kept getting the ads when I tried.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-using-SISTER-inspiration-drawings-bars.html
 
Request for prayers from Travis' sister as we near verdict

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - a view from the inside: observations from our own court observers #9

Status Update

By Justice for Travis Alexander

Message from Tanisha Sorenson
To All the Supporters of Travis and our Family,
As the time is now near to verdict time our family needs your support more than ever now. You all have been true examples of Christ, very giving , caring, kind hearted, and loving. The support of all of you has been heartfelt and has brought many smiles to our families faces during these hard times. We will be forever grateful !
I know that the most important thing we can all continue doing is getting down on our knees and praying to the Lord that we will have Justice for Travis here on this earth. I know there will be Justice in the life to come in the eternities but I feel that the Lord will also have his hand in bringing Justice here on earth. Our Heavenly father hears our prayers and he will answer them.
The jury will get this case on Monday the 6th and that's why I have a special request from all of you to join us as we pray and fast for the Jury, For our Family, For Travis, and For the Ultimate Justice in this case. My family and I will be fasting and praying on Sunday May 5th. I know from my own personal experience that the Lord has answered my prayers after I fasted, and that's why I know if we all do it on Sunday the 5th , he will see that we all have faith in him and that Justice is what we want and I feel he will deliver as he touches the hearts of the Jurors.
We have all been brought together thru this horrible tragedy, we have all been touched by Travis and his inspiration as he was alive, by the things he did while he was alive, and by the people he helped and served while he was alive, and because of the Death of this amazing man , we all share the love, the loss, the hope, the sorrow, the life, the faith, the gratitude, the strength, the empathy, and the unity, together. May the Lord continued to bless all of you for all the strength and love you have shown our family.
Don't be sad for Travis for he is happy, in a wonderful place doing the Lords work, he continues to teach, learn, serve, laugh, make others laugh, sing, and rejoice in happiness. He is with our Savior Jesus Christ, he is with us in our hearts and minds , and he will be with us as we get the Verdict of Guilty of first degree Murder and have Justice for him! Our family loves you all!! Our Heavenly Father loves you, and Travis loves you!!
Justice4Travis!!!
 
http://t.co/wOmWZ03O4G


.


Posted: 8:26 PM
Last Updated: 13 hours ago

By: MaryEllen Resendez

PHOENIX - A mutual friend of accused murderer Jodi Arias and victim Travis Alexander is speaking out for the first time since he testified for the defense in January.

Daniel Freeman was the friend caught in the middle. He was closer to Alexander, but so charmed by Arias he considered her part of his family.

“She was like a sister. She was part of the family and in my family when you’re a friend you’re family,” said Freeman of his once close relationship to Arias.

Freeman said what most people don’t know is that he was closer to Alexander, but wanted to give Arias the benefit of the doubt when fingers instantly pointed her way after Alexander was found dead.

Arias faces a possible death sentence if convicted of first-degree murder in the June 2008 killing of Alexander in his suburban Phoenix home.

“I kind of defended her and said ‘you know I don't know if she did it or not, but I can't treat her like she has unless I know, and the person I know wouldn't have done it,” said Freeman.

Freeman said he now realizes he really didn’t know Arias all that well.

On the day she was arrested a friend called to “rub” it in, but the news came an hour after his brother committed suicide and Freeman was consumed by a different tragedy.

“At that point, it really didn’t matter," said Freeman.

Freeman visited Arias several times in jail, but the visits soon stopped. He just needed to move on.

“People would tell me to go see her when I was in town. I would think about it, but then never went,” said Freeman.

In 2010 Freeman was told he could be called to testify for either the prosecution or the defense and not to watch news reports.

He didn’t watch the news and his friends held back telling him things.

“My grandmother has watched the entire trial and hasn’t told me a thing,” said Freeman.

So Freeman had never heard Arias’ third and final claim that she killed in self-defense. He only knew the intruder story.

Arias’ attorneys called him to testify with only two choices, come on his own free will or be subpoenaed.

“I was just there to tell the truth and whoever called me would've got the same answers” said Freeman.

When Freeman took the stand he said Arias didn’t look like the Jodi he knew.

“Whey started the questioning that’s when I realized they were trying to paint Travis as the bad guy. Sitting on the stand, I kind of smiled because I knew that wouldn't work. He was a good guy - there wasn't anything bad in anything I ever saw,” recalled Freeman.

Freeman remembers looking over to Arias wondering what was she thinking, but only got a blank stare in return.

He also recalls looking over at Prosecutor Juan Martinez chuckling with Detective Estaban Flores. He said he knew Martinez was about to make him a witness for the prosecution and he welcomed it.

“At least it crossed my mind and whether or not it crossed his I don't know. But what crossed my mind was he realized I was just telling the truth and that I wasn't for the defense and that most of what I said he could actually use,” Freeman told ABC15

Arias’ final story that Alexander physically, emotionally and sexually abused her was too much for Freeman.

“To me, I see someone who was a good man being dragged through the mud. We all have our weaknesses; we all have the things in our lives that we struggle with that are vices and it's not often that we have all our vices and dirty laundry dragged out for the whole world to see.”

In court, Freeman told jurors Arias and Alexander fought, but nothing out of the ordinary from a typical couple.

He said Alexander wanted to move on, but Arias just kept coming around and Alexander had trouble saying “no” to her.

"When you're living a lifestyle that conflicts with your belief's to the degree with what Travis was doing, to me, that was why he said he couldn't marry her. He told me that before he said 'I love her, I care about her, but I can't marry her.'”

And as for Arias’ latest claims in court, Freeman shakes his head.

“I don't believe her story. He (Travis) was murdered.”


Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/regio...-arias-and-alexander-speaks-out#ixzz2RhEHSfb1
 
Jodi Arias Trial: Dismissed Juror Says It Was a 'Great Experience'


By ALYSSA NEWCOMB (@alyssanewcomb)
April 27, 2013


A juror in the Jodi Arias trial who was dismissed after listening to four months of proceedings called his time on the jury a "great experience."

Police in Gilbert, Ariz., said when Daniel Gibb was arrested last Saturday night, he told the arresting officer he was a juror on the Jodi Arias murder trial.

On Tuesday, the officer met with the judge, prosecutor and defense attorneys in a sealed hearing, ABC News' Phoenix affiliate KNXV-TV reported.


http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias...eat-experience/story?id=19057818#.UX5f9b4o7rc
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
306
Total visitors
448

Forum statistics

Threads
609,448
Messages
18,254,321
Members
234,656
Latest member
GentleWarrior
Back
Top