I wholeheartedly agree. I find it amazingly odd, also, that an alleged executor would use an Obituary to communicate with a deceased person's loved ones about mementos and personal items of the deceased.
And you would think that if whomever wrote the Obit/or the Millards (or WM) was so close to EG such that he was named Executor of her estate, and seemed to know so much about her family's history, that surely he would have had some other less bizarre way to make contact with the family to advise of such matters.
I think the entire EG thing is nothing but a sham and it laid the foundation for the creation of a bogus Animal Welfare Fund in her name.........which then became the very same Fund that people were asked to make their donations to in WM's obit. I think it's nothing but a sham for DM to get some extra cash. This opinion of mine is further supported by the fact that her Obit was printed in the Toronto Star nearly 2 years AFTER her reported death. That makes no sense to me. I can find NO info on her anywhere. I can find no info on her father or mother anywhere.
Question: aren't there certain legal processes or protocols for setting up such a fund to ensure that it's VALID and LEGIT so that if people do make donations, they are not being scammed/duped?
