katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 68,065
- Reaction score
- 241,283
If he thought he was going to be spending the night with his friends, he very well may have carried all his things. IMO
How was he planning to get there?
If he thought he was going to be spending the night with his friends, he very well may have carried all his things. IMO
If he thought he was going to be spending the night with his friends, he very well may have carried all his things. IMO
How was he planning to get there?
Do you think MK wouldn't assist MR?
I believe I said in my earlier response, "so if he set out on foot to hitch a ride to his friend's house...."
He also said he didn't know where to search. I imagine that it's overwhelming to have a child missing for any parent.
Was it confirmed by MR if he was spending the night with his friends ?
Out to Marc Klaas. Marc, weigh in.
MARC KLAAS, KLAAS KIDS FOUNDATION (via telephone): Well, first of all, Nancy, people are pointing a lot of fingers at the father because he was the last person to see Dylan alive, also because law enforcement is not treating this like a runaway, by any means, not if they`re taking cadaver dogs into lakes, not if they`re running multi-jurisdictional searches.
And also, the father is being very mean towards the mother and the brother. He`s not contacting them. He`s not providing any information to them. He`s a reluctant witness, as far as the media goes.
So I can understand why people would point fingers at this guy. And I think that he has to be a lot more forthcoming if we`re going to have a chance of finding Dylan.
I don`t believe this little boy ran away. His cell phone, apparently, was turned off immediately, which was out of character. So nothing is adding up in this case.
GRACE: Out to Marc Klaas, president and founder of KlaasKids.
Marc, when you mentioned that the dad was being, quote, "mean," and kind of hoarding information from the mom about this little boy`s disappearance, what did you mean?
KLAAS: Well, Nancy, she told ABC News that she was having a difficult time getting in touch with her ex-husband about their son. She said, he hasn`t had any contact with us. My older son tried to get ahold of him by texting him and he wouldn`t respond.
I just find it odd that at a time like this he would be so evasive. I think that`s -- I think that`s cruel. When your child is missing, I think that that`s absolutely cruel to withhold information from the child`s other parent.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1211/28/ng.01.html
I don't believe so, but again my response was:
"If he thought he was going to be spending the night with his friends..."
Without contacting his friends when he had no idea at that stage where they was at ??
We now know that Dylan could use wifi if his phone stopped working and yet no word of Dylan even being alive after Sunday night :cow:
Do you think MK wouldn't assist MR?
I absolutely agree that it would be overwhelming to have a child missing and I personally thank God that I don't.
I understand not knowing where to look, I don't understand looking in the very place that he has publicly stated he doesn't believe Dylan is. If MR doesn't think Dylan is in the county or in the lake, why continue to look there? Look somewhere, anywhere, else.
What's that quote about doing the same action over and over again but expecting a different result?
BBM
I think that MR addressed both the bolded remarks. Based on the DP show, I find MR's perceptions of EH and CR supported. He did not eliminate communication; he did limit it to a format that allowed him to not be verbally accused. Also, MR's call in to the show begins to address the media reluctance.
BBM
I think that MR addressed both the bolded remarks. Based on the DP show, I find MR's perceptions of EH and CR supported. He did not eliminate communication; he did limit it to a format that allowed him to not be verbally accused. Also, MR's call in to the show begins to address the media reluctance.
Not if he thinks he might be guilty. JMO
It has been 6 months. Why is Mark contacting him now?
I believe I said in my earlier response, "so if he set out on foot to hitch a ride to his friend's house...."
So you think Mark Klaas would go by his personal feelings and not help in Dylan's case because it was the father who reached out?
I don't know why it's taken that long. AFAIK no one has contacted a missing persons organization. Better late than never?
His son is MISSING and he won't talk to his ex wife? He only allows her to text him? What a cowardly response, imo.