Here's another article - they're calling the suspicious guy "U.P.", for "unnamed person", and yet they're fully naming the guy who's lying to provide an alibi for U.P. Why? Why name an assumed innocent man, (who did lie, though) and not name someone who's certainly a "person of interest" in this case? Who is he, that they're trying so hard to hide his identity, to the point of not pursuing this girl's disappearance for a decade?
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_2698617
edited to add: what a truly grisly picture, too, at this link. The faces are distorted, but the actual subject of the photo, with the doll . . . is grisly. How sad.