Pattymarie
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 2,102
- Reaction score
- 0
I just wanna know one thing...when does CA find time/money to get her roots done?
Cindy and GA were completely out of line today charging in there threatening people and saying they were going to have people arrested and GA yanking a sign that he gave to a woman and taking it back which was stealing. The A's should have been arrested.
I don't think the Court has appointed a guardian because the Court does not feel there is a living child to appoint a guardian for. Sadly, I believe the Court has known this from the beginning, therefore no appointment.
I think he is the founder from Kid Finders. I wouldn't be my life on it but I have seen him with GA before.Thanks for the link. Does anyone know who the combative guy in the blue shirt is? Also, remember the woman that George pushed, the one Lee tried to take the sign away from - she was there too.
I have thought about this - The courts need to step in here. Cindy and George swear the child is alive. Going on their assumption then the court needs to appoint a Guardian ad Litem for Caylee.
They have NO LEGAL rights to Caylee, so they legally cannot speak for her in anyway.
I am writing the DA and ask they appoint a Guardian ad Litem for Caylee. A legal guardian is a person who has the legal authority (and the corresponding duty) to care for the personal and property interests of another person, called a ward. Usually, a person has the status of guardian because the ward is incapable of caring for his or her own interests due to infancy, incapacity, or disability.
Geez, Turbo, I've thought that for a long time, but I'm glad you've brought it up again. It's way overdue for someone, other than LE, to have Caylee's best interests at heart. (And the searchers, too, of course.) Maybe at this point the results would be twofold: first, Caylee would be protected; second, maybe Cindy would shut her yap.
LOL -- my fingers and brain same to be getting short circuited, too! (Perhaps the case?)
I understand your logic statement completely. But do you think there's any way humanly possible that a case could be made that, since there are conflicting views as to Caylee's status, that it would be in her best interests to have a guardian appointed? I'm sure Cindy would jump up and down and screech, which would give the court even more reason to appoint a neutral party as guardian.
Well, I don't see how. Caylee is known/believed (by forensic testing/legal ideology) to be deceased. She did not have any known "property or financial attributes" if you will to protect or insure. So, legally, no need for a guardian.
How about who gets to profit financially in the future off her name?
How about who gets to profit financially in the future off her name?
Cindy and GA were completely out of line today charging in there threatening people and saying they were going to have people arrested and GA yanking a sign that he gave to a woman and taking it back which was stealing. The A's should have been arrested.
I have thought about this - The courts need to step in here. Cindy and George swear the child is alive. Going on their assumption then the court needs to appoint a Guardian ad Litem for Caylee.
They have NO LEGAL rights to Caylee, so they legally cannot speak for her in anyway.
I am writing the DA and ask they appoint a Guardian ad Litem for Caylee. A legal guardian is a person who has the legal authority (and the corresponding duty) to care for the personal and property interests of another person, called a ward. Usually, a person has the status of guardian because the ward is incapable of caring for his or her own interests due to infancy, incapacity, or disability.
I think he is the founder from Kid Finders. I wouldn't be my life on it but I have seen him with GA before.
And they're already putting a trademark symbol after her name on their site.
But who knows, maybe Casey signed papers giving them authority while she's in jail?
Well, I don't see how. Caylee is known/believed (by forensic testing/legal ideology) to be deceased. She did not have any known "property or financial attributes" if you will to protect or insure. So, legally, no need for a guardian.