geevee
Well-Known Stickie
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 17,623
- Reaction score
- 16,583
Not only the Aussies (love those guys). :flashback:
Just catching up on the overnight (in my time zone) session.
Trial Discussion Thread #45 - 14.07.3, Day 36
- Thread starter beach
- Start date
- Status
Not only the Aussies (love those guys). :flashback:
Just catching up on the overnight (in my time zone) session.
Yes, and didn't we just hear from OP's walking billboard the other day that OP had taken someone else to London with him?
Yes, but he's had a whole lifetime to man up and deal with it.
AJ_DS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 836
- Reaction score
- 0
Certain individuals believe that the pornographic material that was accessed on Oscar Pistorius's iPad on 13 February 2013 at 18:29 could possibly be some unsolicited spam or pop-up.
It was NOT… It was clearly a series of 3 deliberate actions
1 – Oscar Pistorius typed ‘youj!zz’ in Google search engine.
2 – Oscar Pistorius selected the free pornographic video web site for mobile devices ‘m.youj!zz.com'
3 – Oscar Pistorius selected the video ‘...videos/5/1/1/6/’ which started playing on the iPad immediately after selecting it.
Although this was not put into Court record during Colonel Michael Sales testimony, it was put into evidence.
A photograph of the screen which was displaying the web history downloaded from that iPad made its way to the Internet.
It was NOT… It was clearly a series of 3 deliberate actions
1 – Oscar Pistorius typed ‘youj!zz’ in Google search engine.
2 – Oscar Pistorius selected the free pornographic video web site for mobile devices ‘m.youj!zz.com'
3 – Oscar Pistorius selected the video ‘...videos/5/1/1/6/’ which started playing on the iPad immediately after selecting it.
Although this was not put into Court record during Colonel Michael Sales testimony, it was put into evidence.
A photograph of the screen which was displaying the web history downloaded from that iPad made its way to the Internet.
D
Deleted member 102539
Guest
This is an apology for several things, but nor for murder. That's also truth. IMO
Chelly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 18,807
- Reaction score
- 66,935
Word of the day: STARTLE
Listening to Prof D's testimony was brutal. During cross I was almost embarrassed for him, thankful his face couldn't be seen. Does anyone else think even m'lady was a bit lost near the end of Del's questioning of the witness. Looking forward to Monday's wrap-up.
Listening to Prof D's testimony was brutal. During cross I was almost embarrassed for him, thankful his face couldn't be seen. Does anyone else think even m'lady was a bit lost near the end of Del's questioning of the witness. Looking forward to Monday's wrap-up.
Chelly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 18,807
- Reaction score
- 66,935
Oh my. I suspect the website will enjoy a surge. :floorlaugh:Certain individuals believe that the pornographic material that was accessed on Oscar Pistorius's iPad on 13 February 2013 at 18:29 could possibly be some unsolicited spam or pop-up.
It was NOT It was clearly a series of 3 deliberate actions
1 Oscar Pistorius typed youj!zz in Google search engine.
2 Oscar Pistorius selected the free pornographic video web site for mobile devices m.youj!zz.com'
3 Oscar Pistorius selected the video ...videos/5/1/1/6/ which started playing on the iPad immediately after selecting it.
Although this was not put into Court record during Colonel Michael Sales testimony, it was put into evidence.
A photograph of the screen which was displaying the web history downloaded from that iPad made its way to the Internet.
AJ_DS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 836
- Reaction score
- 0
Are we quite sure that Nel will wrap-up Wayne Derman's cross-examination and Oldwage the re-examination, all on Monday ??
Do we believe the Defence has further witnesses or was Wayne Derman the last one ?
Mr. O'Sullivan, I have 3 words for you: External backup drive.
Lost? Umm imo probably just as frustrated as Nel was getting by having the Prof obfuscate for the umpteenth time on something he was claiming to be an expert on but for some reason(imo bias) is incapable of applying a hypothetical situation to. Yet by detailing every possible physiological response to this "startle" or "fright" for the defense, he had been doing just that in an obvious backdoor attempt to make the court believe that OP had been a victim to all of it, with no proof which he eventually admitted to Nel. Now Nel needs to make sure the court caught that.
Chelly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 18,807
- Reaction score
- 66,935
Could be wrong but I think I read upthread that Dr. D was last witness. IMO, the defense had high hopes for his testimony.
I'd forgotten about the *advertiser censored* and at the time wondered why it wasn't made a bigger deal of by Nel but there had to be either some kind of agreement between the DT or the judge and Nel. Any other criminal case the world over it would have been pounced on by attorneys to try and show some kind of deviant behaviour. Perhaps they couldn't prove it was OP and the DT could have said they'd imply it was Reeva if Nel tried making it an issue or maybe it was out of respect for June Steenkamp who was in court to see what were her daughter's last words on this planet? 
Not sure who posted this, but it's not the first time I've watched either OP or one of the DT make similiar actions, I guess they still don't realize just how much a camera can catch. Although to be fair, Nel tends to nod yes or shake his head no in a not very subtle way when he's asking questions. The only difference is that Nel does it for everyone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxTxPcLFYC8&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxTxPcLFYC8&feature=youtu.be
Hello Val.
I posted it and then deleted it because I thought I'd used a link that might identify me. (computer illiterate)
Was looking for the Twitter link where I first saw it but can't find it now.
I've seen both Nel and Roux nod or shake their heads when waiting for answers, but something about the sneaky way OP does it while very intently staring at witness (forgot his name) doesn't sit right.
I posted it and then deleted it because I thought I'd used a link that might identify me. (computer illiterate)
Was looking for the Twitter link where I first saw it but can't find it now.
I've seen both Nel and Roux nod or shake their heads when waiting for answers, but something about the sneaky way OP does it while very intently staring at witness (forgot his name) doesn't sit right.
minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 4,943
No one proved the magazine rack didnt move before Oscar shot Reeva. So the third sound that he thought was the door opening could have been the magazine rack moving while Reeva was in the toilet.
Certain individuals believe that the pornographic material that was accessed on Oscar Pistorius's iPad on 13 February 2013 at 18:29 could possibly be some unsolicited spam or pop-up.
It was NOT It was clearly a series of 3 deliberate actions
1 Oscar Pistorius typed youj!zz in Google search engine.
2 Oscar Pistorius selected the free pornographic video web site for mobile devices m.youj!zz.com'
3 Oscar Pistorius selected the video ...videos/5/1/1/6/ which started playing on the iPad immediately after selecting it.
Although this was not put into Court record during Colonel Michael Sales testimony, it was put into evidence.
A photograph of the screen which was displaying the web history downloaded from that iPad made its way to the Internet.
Wow, good research .. I was wondering what site OP had accessed because when I listened to the testimony, Roux said 'we'll come back to that' and he never did (from what I recall, or could find).
minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 4,943
I think the point is that he has a disability, despite acting like he doesnt and not wanting to be thought of as disabled.
minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 4,943
It's not an apology for murder, I agree. I think the thrust of the doctor's testimony about disability was to explain how Oscar's vulnerability makes it more likely that he really believed there was an intruder coming after him. The first hurdle for the defense is getting the judge to accept that it's reasonably possibly true that Oscar believed there was an intruder.
- Status