fasteddy8170
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 341
- Reaction score
- 153
Thank you for doing that, Roselvr.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jessica's boyfriend Dakota has pled guilty to 3 felony drug charges:
Dakotah Quail-Dyer pleaded guilty Friday to one count of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, all as a second-time habitual offender, according to Muskegon County Chief Assistant Prosecutor Tim Maat.
http://woodtv.com/2014/07/29/heeringas-boyfriend-pleads-to-drug-charges/
He will be sentenced in Sept. Things may change in the custody of Jessica's and Dakota's son.....
Jessica's boyfriend Dakota has pled guilty to 3 felony drug charges:
Dakotah Quail-Dyer pleaded guilty Friday to one count of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, all as a second-time habitual offender, according to Muskegon County Chief Assistant Prosecutor Tim Maat.
http://woodtv.com/2014/07/29/heeringas-boyfriend-pleads-to-drug-charges/
He will be sentenced in Sept. Things may change in the custody of Jessica's and Dakota's son.....
Quail-Dyer has been fighting to keep custody of his son Zevyn. In court records, he said he has kept his son from Heeringa’s family, in part, because they have falsely accused him of abuse and neglect and threatened to take the boy away.
Maybe he somehow enticed her by saying he had some really good weed and he would stop by at the end of her shift to give her a sample.
I am saying the guy could have used a ruse saying he had some really good weed and he would stop by at the end of her shift. Maybe using a ruse of this sort so she would open the back door and go near his van. Then instead of sharing his supposed weed ( or whatever) he kidnaps her. I am not saying the weed was the cause of the crime at all. I am saying something like weed could have been used as a ruse.Please, no disrespect, but weed and its varying qualities -- it's just not like that. I've never heard of 'really good weed' as being a motive for a violent crime.
Maybe he somehow enticed her by saying he had some really good weed and he would stop by at the end of her shift to give her a sample.
Please, no disrespect, but weed and its varying qualities -- it's just not like that. I've never heard of 'really good weed' as being a motive for a violent crime.
We do not know if it was violent. Jessica being taken makes no sense what so ever; especially reading what fasteddy points out. I do believe someone went and took photos of where the co-worker supposedly was.
We do not know if she smoked; we know he does. Perhaps she was making his pickup for some reason. What makes no sense to me is I would think most would have it handy; not in the back of a van. The fact that he opened the back of the van & left quickly goes more along the lines of the co-worker suspecting J was stealing. Leave stuff in the back of the store with the light out; someone pulls up quickly throws it in then leaves... But why take her?
I have not been able to make sense of anything using pot or stealing. There is something missing. We're not going to solve this to bring her back to her family. Hopefully her family will find the missing link.
Could have sworn that I read the amount of blood was very small
Some things I noticed from this news article:
The officers that went in initially found no signs of any struggle. Theres nothing tipped over, the back door was locked and latched said Norton Shores Police Chief Daniel Shaw.
Does this mean the perp locked and latched the door from inside and left by the front door? How else would you latch it?
Officers also found a garbage can by the back door, as if Jessica had been getting ready to take the trash out as she closed the store
A regular routine that someone knew?
I do think that she was taken by somebody that she knew said Shaw
I think this also.
We need to know whether or not that van was actually involved, or just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, said Chief Shaw.
Kind of like the witness was in the right place at the right time? I'm thinking there is a good possibility this is a red herring.
Theyve narrowed it down to about four potential suspects people either connected to Jessicas past or customers at the store.
Someone that knew there were no cameras. Two or maybe a third were involved , one or two was on the lookout while the other did it. The window of opportunity was very small.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/one-year-la...om-gas-station
I am in the group who believes the report of the van ( and detailed description of the abductor..) are bogus. Maybe because the witness is trying to protect someone, maybe because she just wanted to make herself important at the time and never thought it would go this far... regardless. I dont believe in the silver van. SO... If we dont believe there was a silver van seen by the witness... what other scenarios are possible? The picture of the back door shows a trash can RIGHT IN FRONT OF IT... if she were dragged out, the trash can would surely be pushed aside.
To me this leaves her going out back of her own will.
WHY?
I agree with Fasteddy- Why she was taken during work hours is puzzling. SO much easier to wait till she left at the end of the shift. Much less likely to be seen. So did something go down when she walked out back- not planned? Is there a reason why it had to be while the store was still open? ( something in the back room he wanted?)
Since I also believe the witness' story is bogus... how would that change our time line? If we leave out the whole witness 'driving by and saw the lights out and turned around" scenario- it we JUST look at the time between when the last known customer ( the Bic lighter lady) was in there... and when the store was discovered to be empty- how long are we looking at? The only times we KNOW are the bic lighter sale.. and the 911 call when the store was empty... everything else is just ... hearsay? Even if the witness did see what she thought she did.. unless she looked at the time, she could be off by quite a bit...
Thoughts?
I was thinking about this last night. I'm not sure what they mean by locked and latched. There was no outside handle, so I think the door probably latched automatically when it closed. That would be why Jessica propped it open to smoke...so it didn't close and lock her out.
I worked at a thrift store years ago and we had a door like that. The drain where we had to dump our mop water at night was just outside that door. We always propped it open with a paint can so we didn't get locked out. If it closed, you couldn't open it from the outside. It had no handle, but it also locked until someone pushed on the handle/bar and opened it from the inside.