Re. the jeans outside on the ground .. I was originally in the 'belt camp' but actually, looking more closely, I'm not so sure .. I'm not really sure which bits are the 'loops' being referred to as where the 'belt' goes through but all I can see are two quite big, dark, loops which are deffo not jeans type loops although I can't really make out what they are (shame we don't have a clearer photo to be able to zoom in, isn't it!). It's still a very odd place for them to be, anyway, and I really can't see Reeva hanging washing over railings, etc, she did some other washing and the jeans would've been hung up wherever she hung the rest of the washing (and presumably it was all dry by then as her bag was fairly well packed?). It's just too co-incidental that they 'just so happened' to be directly under the bathroom/toilet window, as are all the other bits of damage around the house, they are all just too co-incidental to be ignored, too and should've been taken into account in the 'big picture' instead of just dismissed out of hand simply because, as individual pieces, they could not prove anything. I'm sure there are many other murder cases where they collect together all of these things to build the scene, they don't just find a weapon, test it for DNA and then say 'ah, that matches, you must be the murderer/have murdered', they have to use that evidence along with all sorts of other circumstantial evidence, because actually, even DNA on a knife could probably be argued away one way or another by the murderer, so the conviction itself has to comprise of a number of other things, i.e. things which build the whole picture. This was not done in this case, and we know exactly 'why', too.