I think if he did what you are describing, sneaked into the U.S. for treatment, I would expect the majority of US citizens to do the same if in his shoes. This hysteria is just ridiculous!
This is an absolute shame that the vomit is just now being cleaned up. Are you kidding me?
I suppose if they pass a law to that effect for ebola, people could be prosecuted. At this time, there is no such law.Can you not be prosecuted for attempted murder by willfully having sex with others if you have hiv and not telling them? So if that's the case wouldn't willingly exposing others to ebola be the same?
During a press conference just broadcast on CNN it was revealed that the family members of patient Duncan who are quarantined have been non-compliant with the quarantine. They were not at home when the CDC came to take their temperature. In addition, they sent one of their children back to school. The CDC came to the school and removed the child from the classroom.
This is not good.
'During a press conference just broadcast on CNN it was revealed that the family members of patient Duncan who are quarantined have been non-compliant with the quarantine. They were not at home when the CDC came to take their temperature. In addition, they sent one of their children back to school. The CDC came to the school and removed the child from the classroom.
This is not good.
Still trying to figure out what happens if vomit, etc... gets in the water system.
People are finally saying what I've thought all along.He KNEW what he was doing, and he chose to come here, to " visit" the USA and to possibly infect children and relatives in TX.
I wish he had died the day he arrived in the USA. Then no nurses or hospital personnel would have had to touch him, and likely most of those school children would not have been exposed to Ebola either.
The vomit cleaners have no protective clothing........JMO
That's what I was thinking... it has to be some kind of infringement on constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.Only just started following this thread, but if anyone's interested, here's a neat writeup of the legal issues surrounding involuntary quarantine (using an instance of drug-resistant TB as an example, but this all applies to ebola as well):
http://www.americanbar.org/publications/law_practice_today_home/law_practice_today_archive/april11/protecting_civil_liberties_during_quarantine_and_isolation_in_public_health_emergencies.html
TL;DR - It isn't as simple as just locking them up. Huge U.S. constitutional implications.
this can clearly be factually disproved, but awesome that you wish someone dead anyway .....
That's what I was thinking... it has to be some kind of infringement on constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.
Can you not be prosecuted for attempted murder by willfully having sex with others if you have hiv and not telling them? So if that's the case wouldn't willingly exposing others to ebola be the same?