"Perhaps the accused rented a U-Haul, but there's no evidence of that."
Do you mean to say, "LE has not shared with the public whether there is evidence of DG renting a U-Haul, but since they haven't, I suspect there is none"?
"The evidence is that the green truck belonging to the accused it critically important to the investigation into the three missing and murdered persons."
Do you mean to say, "LE
suspect that the green truck shown 'several times' on CCTV during the critical time period, is the same truck found at DG's residence, and it seems to me that it is critically important to the investigation"?
"The question was whether the victims were seen by anyone after they were murdered at the Parkhill house."
I believe the question was, "is there a link stating that the murdered bodies were seen in the back of the pickup truck, as you had stated that as a fact a few posts ago.
Further, contrary to what was stated as fact, there
have been multiple reports to LE, reported by MSM, of the trio being seen ALIVE, as well as reports from the public on other forums.
"Perhaps I should have said ... it's very likely that the only time they were seen was in the back of the pickup truck, or that in my opinion the only place they were seen was in the back of a pickup truck."
Yes, thank you, that would be playing by the rules of this forum. It is confusing to me, and I'm sure others, when statements are presented as fact when they are merely opinion. I believe we are to use 'IMOO', or 'MOO', or 'IMHO', etc.
"Regardless, they were not seen by anyone after they were murdered at the Parkhill house"
Do you have a link showing the trio was murdered at the Parkhill house?
Police are still searching for the bodies.
Again, we don't know exactly what LE were (possibly still are, but there do not seem to be any MSM reports lately which indicate that to be true) searching for. Some suggest, in their opinions, there are no bodies remaining to be found. LE has stated that public search teams would be ineffective since 'they don't know what they're looking for'. It would be assumed that the public would know to look for 'bodies', so that is an odd statement for LE to have made if they were searching for bodies.
"If there was nothing in that truck that interested police, they wouldn't have been so interested in that truck. They would have been pursuing every single vehicle that was seen in surveillance video ... but they weren't. They were only interested in the pickup truck."
I had read the MSM articles regarding the green truck seen in the video, and I believe it clearly stated that LE's interest in the truck was because it had been seen 'several times' in the vicinity during the critical time period. Did you read that LE saw the bodies in the back of the truck? If so, please provide a link.
Your statement above actually scares me, because that is exactly the type of thing I fear in that it is possible that LE could be focussing on one thing, perhaps with blinders to additional things that also could have been pursued.
"Furthermore, the angle of the camera gives a clear view into the back of the pickup truck."
Yes, we, the public, can see the picture too, and in the truck bed I do not see any bodies, nor bodies covered up with bedding in the photo, do you?
Perhaps the accused rented a U-Haul, but there's no evidence of that. The evidence is that the green truck belonging to the accused it critically important to the investigation into the three missing and murdered persons. Why would we think that a U-Haul was used?
I'm pretty sure that the video surveillance picked up the victims in the back of the green pick-up truck, but we'll have to wait for trial to learn whether that is true, or whether the owner of the green pickup ran out to rent a U-Haul in the middle of a triple murder.
The question was whether the victims were seen by anyone after they were murdered at the Parkhill house. I answered that they only place they were seen was in the back of a pick up truck. Perhaps I should have said ... it's very likely that the only time they were seen was in the back of the pickup truck, or that in my opinion the only place they were seen was in the back of a pickup truck. Regardless, they were not seen by anyone after they were murdered at the Parkhill house. Police are still searching for the bodies.
I do have an idea how the victims were removed from the crime scene. They were dragged out of the house via the side door and to the driveway, where a green truck was parked, and they were then put into the back of the green truck. This opinion is based on information about recently washed dark stains that stretched from the side door to the driveway, and police interest in the green truck belonging to the accused that was seen in video surveillance on the night of the murder. If there was nothing in that truck that interested police, they wouldn't have been so interested in that truck. They would have been pursuing every single vehicle that was seen in surveillance video ... but they weren't. They were only interested in the pickup truck. Furthermore, the angle of the camera gives a clear view into the back of the pickup truck. Given police interest in bedding, it's quite likely that bedding was put on top of the victims after they were put in the back of the pickup truck.
