Conductor71
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Messages
- 582
- Reaction score
- 12
In addition to that is the bizarre bomb case Camblos was involved in a few years back, the following is excerpt from an interview on that case.
"Camblos said that the oldest kid in the case (the ringleader) was born on the 100th anniversary of Hitlers birthday and the anniversary of Columbine. I held my breath during the sentence, thinking where can he possibly be going with this?. And then he did it Camblos concluded the sentence with: we took that very, very seriously.
I think it important to point out that this colorful career episode is from his tenure as county prosecutor. So, I think this may speak to the larger issue of how courts, including judges, may be suspect in their motivations. Although they may mean well, there exists little to no oversight. That an appointed or elected legal professional could publicly assert such nonsense, yet can and do boggles the mind. It can result in a colossal waste of tax dollars and absurd wrongful convictions.
On a side note in absurdity, our county prosecutor actually charged a man with killing a protected reptile without a permit; he killed a venomous snake to protect his kids; the snake just happened to be a state emblem. He was found guilty or a misdemeanor. Ahem.