flatfootjoe
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2014
- Messages
- 391
- Reaction score
- 0
how anybody could have known before the autopsy that anything had been poured into her mouth is beyond me, unless she said it herself in the moments she is said to be speaking or maybe, just maybe if you had a paramedic on scene that had very extensive knowledge of burn injuries.
and even if we assume that it turns out to be true - what sheriff or rescue person is going to be saying taht to the father of the victim at the scene? detailing specific horrific things that were done to his daughter? i dont know, that whole issue just makes no sense to me, and yeah, if it was just AA claiming it i would have all sorts of alarms going off. but her fathers comments muddy that whole thing for me.
My thoughts EXACTLY. We're talking about the sheriff, not a junior officer, but a man who's usually elected based on his competency. In this instance AA is either lying, or telling us truthfully that the sheriff himself has no respect for his position or the confidentiality of his citizenry. The whole they thing too, that particular choice of words just sounds sinister.