But the problem is what she is saying. She is making it sound like the jurors DISCUSSED the testimony of JA. And that would be a big NO NO--possibly resulting in a mistrial.
I suppose the jurors DID find it strange to return after lunch and the whole courtroom, usually filled or nearly filled, was suddenly empty. I would think I'd be looking around at the other jurors with a look on my face that showed I was wondering, "Where did everyone go while we were out to lunch?" I would think all the jurors were thinking, What happened?