Spellbound
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 37,315
http://archive.freep.com/article/20...t-waiting-for-answers-justice-Julia-Niswender
(This article is from April 2013, after Jim T. did his polygraph test.)
SBM:
According to the article, people passed the polygraph before this date (April 2013), but at some point after the polygraphs, LE had reason to request another on-the-record-interview which JT has refused. It seems they know Julia's activities during the days prior, and would like to know more about the activities of others close to the investigation center. LE will almost always start with the immediate family of a victim and work out. That does not surprise me at all. However, most families will be cooperative, above and beyond what is requested, without hesitation. "WHY does he hesitate?", would be my question. It makes it appear he is covering up something, whether knowledge he knows will help, or something that might indicate another person's involvement? It isn't entirely impossible to think LE has nothing much to go on and are hopeful that by getting a more credible report (signed, on-the-record) will possibly bring another clue as to where they can look next.
From the linked article, snippits:
"We've also polygraphed numerous people," Yuhas said. "Everyone that has been polygraphed at this point has not only cooperated with the investigation but passed the polygraph."
Police executed more than 10 search warrants, including ones on social media accounts and homes.
Police also have retraced the final days of Niswender's life. And they've gone back to interview people who knew her years ago, looking for clues."We have a pretty good idea of her behavior for the three or four days prior to her death," Yuhas said. "There's really nothing that stands out that would point to anything of any significance."