Sutton
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,353
- Reaction score
- 64
So why is the guy in the fake taxi picking up paying customers including couples and men (SAS soldiers no less) if he is a serial killer?....
Wouldn't he want to keep the fake taxi on the down low?
Especially considering this:
How do you suppose he knew the weaknesses in the police force and their investigative techniques?
It seems very convenient to pin every single crime from the area on the same guy right before the 20 year anniversary of SS disappearance. Especially when you also have a deadbeat that was walking around the nightclub area offering lifts to women and claiming to be the son of a policeman.
In the articles it's mentioned that a couple got in a fake cab that was a Holden, and the SAS guy got one that was a Ford Falcon. If police thought it was a fake taxi why would they let these articles go to print and alert the guy driving the fake taxis that they were onto him? He would have been reasonably easy to find given he was driving around the Swanbourne area and once sat in a hotel carpark for 3 hours. Plus also drove into the army barracks. You'd think they'd have captured him on video driving into the army barracks right? Given that it occurred on Jan 14 and SAS soldier reported it before the end of January, footage should have existed?
Maybe he wasn't actively picking up customers, but sitting off to the side a bit, only taking on fares when he was approached. The article does indicate he reluctantly gave the SAS soldier a ride.
I think Caporn's quote regarding the killer knowing investigative and taxi regulatory weaknesses was an explanation to the public for not having caught the guy. The perpetrator had studied everything so thoroughly and intensely, how could you blame police?
Also, what weaknesses was he referring to? The killer knew it was easy to impersonate a taxi driver? That's obvious, no studying required. The killer knew he had two or three days before the girls were reported missing and police started looking? Once again, this is obvious. The killer knew police would be hesitant to connect this to other assaults? Obvious, there were few media reports on the assaults, and even less connecting them to each other.
Good point regarding why the police would announce the car makes and alert the perpetrator. I don't know.
Why did the perp drive into the barracks? Maybe he doubted he'd be identified; what would connect him to the crimes? Maybe he figured the soldier wouldn't find the meter absence odd. It does sound as if he tried to not take the fare.