So, in your mind the fact that they had other law enforcement bodies telling them "We believe we know the guy that did it" and they chose not to investigate or put him in a photo lineup doesn't constitute an unfair investigation/trial ?
forget about the DNA. They CHOSE to look away from someone other law enforcement was pointing at. It wasn't steve avery pointing the finger, it was other law enforcement.
That's not a maybe. That's factual.
But you want me to accept that again they might not do the same thing again , with a 36 million dollar lawsuit in the mix?? :/
Yet...
they didn't investigate the ex boyfriend.
They didn't investigate chuck and earl avery who had sexual assault pasts and access to the junkyard ?
Are you suggesting that the ex-boyfriend and ex convicts of sexual crimes are
insane leads ?
Earl hid under a pile of clothes when they came to interview him for heavens sake!
I'm confused.
Don't get me wrong, I think on a very logical level, you and I likely believe the same thing, as I believe that the probability of Steve Avery being the killer is very high.
But where we differ is I believe in an actual investigation, even when you are 99% certain you got your guy.