Sutton
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,353
- Reaction score
- 64
With reguards to the CCTV, from JR's sister:
A couple of days after she went missing the police had us watch a video of the Conti, (a
hotel in Claremont) of the people outside and inside. I could see Jane, going up the stairs,
down stairs, mingling with the crowd. The camera only went around every 3 minutes.
Then after the pub closed, or near closing, Jane was out the front and she looked like she
was looking for someone, she was looking at her watch - looking around - that lasted for a
few minutes and then the camera turned around and she wasnt there, so shes obviously
walked somewhere or been picked up by someone.
honouring-survival-is-there-a-rule-book.pdf pg 64
Good find, Mel. Jane's sister said,
"I think it was in the paper on the Tuesday, cause Mum and Dad called the police on the Monday. I think within a couple of days they thought that it was a Claremont serial killing, but they didnt want to speculate but they suggested that it might be."
Two girls go missing and police assume it's a serial killer? That seems premature, unless police had additional information.
Robyn Santen went missing under suspicious circumstances in August 2015. If another woman goes missing next month, will police suspect a serial killer?
Police do almost everything wrong in the investigation, but they are super progressive in recognizing the two disappearances are related and possibly attributed to a serial killer. They formed a task force within a day of being notified Jane was missing.
Does the early assumption of a serial killer seem strange to anyone else? Or what am I missing?
(Mel's link was broken, here's another
http://www.angelhands.org.au/download/file/fid/85 )