I'd guess that Ken Kratz removed the note that read "pls don't eat" thus allowing one or more innocent people to eat the red and blue candies and then placing the note back in the bowl of candies in an attempt to make the person with the visibly red tongue look guilty. As a side note the person with the visibly red tongue would've been discovered by either Lenk or Colburn several weeks after the fact.
View attachment 87101
Glad i didn't have my coffee in front of me or I'd have spit it everywhere!
http://fox6now.com/2016/01/07/febru...a-halbach-takes-the-stand-in-the-avery-trial/
a video with TH's sister on the stand explaining where the lanyard came from.... the evidence key now attached to the other end of the lanyard, and she is touching it. I guess it wasn't a big deal now.
If she actually used that lanyard, I find it so very hard to believe they didn't find her DNA on the clasp or the key?
You and me both. Especially if she'd gripped that lanyard in her palm for years. Her DNA would be embedded. Skin cells, sweat, etc. It's one thing to scrub a piece of plastic and metal but fabric? JMO