Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996-1997, Perth, Western Australia - #8 ARREST*

John Dillinger said:

Extremely close, because if you read further through the comments Dr also quotes



http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com...an/comments/uk_link_in_wa_serial_murders/P50/

this would put him right in the area where BE lives, close to the Airport (knows the base of Polair), Roe Highway where it turned around, and also has the same shaped block. Interesting to see if you can see any verandah posts being replaced around that time.



BE's parents also live in Madora Bay, so yes Dr is close if not BE

Click to expand...

Shortfusepsb said:

He doesn't. However, the seemingly benign post he makes about his (brother?) being on a "Taxi blacklist for being a naughty boy when he was younger" is punctuated by the emoticon, which now we know that that comment was made by the person charged as CSK, just the taxi reference, being a naughty boy when he was younger reference, and then punctuated with a lighthearted indicates that making that comment tickled his (now established) dark sense of humour. It wouldn't be much of a stretch to surmise that he was getting a bit of a kick from making the references, as an inside joke to himself.

The Eagles Nest post is similarly benign, however also punctuated with the emoticon, indicating that he was obtaining some mirth from his post.

I have no delusion that this is not a long bow to draw, as with his almost non-existent digital signature, the sample of two is a very small sample to draw conclusions from, however, it is the only sample that we currently have, and the similarities with the "self-humour" expressed through the emoticon, are there. Nor am I suggesting that this is some case breaking theory or anything other than "just putting it out there."

However, the fact is that both FB posts are made by BE, and that one of those in hindsight could be construed as a creepy reference to the taxi link of the early investigations, and of being a naughty boy in a taxi. And, that the reference amused him to some degree.

Interesting to note is that the only other reference to Eagles Nest in WA (apart from football club connotations), is an area of bushland in an isolated location, with ideal access for disposing of a body.

It was referenced a few posts up, which seems to have been deleted that this is clutching at straws. Perhaps, however I must be clear that this is not some groundbreaking theory.

At this stage, rather than dismissing something said or posted by BE, an open mind would see that everything that he has put out there, or is to put out there is: a) Deliberate information, b) Deliberate misinformation, c) Admissable insight into his psyche.

Click to expand...

BReVeTTe said:

[emoji888]

The general train of thought seems to be that the CSK acted alone, but this may have not always been the case.
Any additional person(s) implicated may have opted out through conscience, illness, death, an escalation in the severity of the attacks, or for whatever reason, their prior involvement placing them in a position of being unable to speak up for fear of the consequences.

Due to the recent DNA profiling from the kimono, Karrakatta and CG, the CSK's timeline has extended drastically, and it goes without saying, that other reported incidents, and missing persons etc, within the extended timeline should now - finally - be under further, much closer scrutiny to assess the validity of any other dots which can possibly be connected.

One matter I am very curious to know more about, is the young WA woman who broke her leg as she successfully managed to escape her attempted abduction by a man hiding in the back of a taxi - in which case, surely the driver of the cab MUST have known he was there???
Was there ever a result on that matter?
Can anyone enlighten me?



[emoji887]

Click to expand...

CP345 said:

It appears that the 'Edwards Family Trust' owned Australian Computer Resellers. The same company that the crimestoppers report on CG said she was last seen in front of. If this ownership is related to BE then this is no coincidence. Also means no vehicle would have been needed at all to transport the victims from the Claremont area immediately.

Click to expand...

JoeDetective said:

WHAM

Click to expand...

CP345 said:

It appears that the 'Edwards Family Trust' owned Australian Computer Resellers. The same company that the crimestoppers report on CG said she was last seen in front of. If this ownership is related to BE then this is no coincidence. Also means no vehicle would have been needed at all to transport the victims from the Claremont area immediately.

Click to expand...

Eph513 said:

If there was an accomplice maybe the accomplice worked within the screen printing industry or had access to screen printing materials, as mentioned by police in the past?

Click to expand...

Grok said:

Ok I will try this again because I stepped across the Sleuths Rules line and the post was deleted. Sorry Mod...I will stick to the facts just outlined in the report.

I find it interesting that there was a business on Stirling HWY called Australian Computer Resellers at the time that Ciara went missing. It is detailed in this report.

https://www.crimestopperswa.com.au/open-cases/ciara-eilish-glennon/

I think it is ok to say the business name as it was in the report and no longer exists.

Click to expand...

JoeDetective said:

Spot on, you sound far too intelligent to be part of WAPOL but I wish they were as insightful as you have been here.
The emoticon indicates there is a joke in there somewhere, why would he need to wink about an obvious potential nickname to a new stadium?
This guy posted so little that you can bet he checked and re-read every single word of that post and it was all intentional.

Click to expand...

JoeDetective said:

Police also said they had the guy, but they just couldn't prove it for years. They didn't they had a slow, simple loner who used to offer lifts to anyone before the murders and after the murder.

KK may have been just one individual but police are making an assumption on the other cases as there is no living witnesses to them that have come forward, only the victim and one other DNA profile indicates highly likely only one perpetrator but would be CAPORNesque to think it could only be one person. MUST keep all options open until definitive evidence proves its impossible

Click to expand...

jubillee said:

Do you know how many businesses in WA are owned by someone with the name Edwards..:facepalm:

Click to expand...