Found Deceased MO - Toni Anderson, 20, North Kansas City, 15 Jan 2017 #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
JerseyGirl said:
If her GPS stopped at the gas station, then perhaps there is some info on the surveillance videos that suggests she or someone else disabled it.

Is that the same gas station that she insisted she had to go to?

I'm getting confused.
Click to expand...

It is a different one.
 
Elainera said:
So if the GPS in the car pinged last at the gas station, as now confirmed, it can only mean that it either happened to malfunction on the night she went missing and at the exact spot she was last seen (what a coincidence!), or someone disabled it. I think we can be pretty sure that someone disabled it deliberately.

Could it be that she went inside to pay and someone sneaked into her car, disabled the GPS, and then kidnapped her when she came back out? That would most likely be someone who knew about the device under the dashboard. If this happened, was the person seen on footage of the gas station? How did he get there? Was a second person involved?

Or, Toni herself disabled the GPS, possibly because she was going to meet up with someone and didn't want this trip to be recorded somewhere. Something illegal? Or simply a secret? Another man? The mysterious text would give credence to this theory.
Click to expand...

It was her or someone that knew it was there. It makes zero sense that a random person would know to do that.
 
MaxManning said:
I corrected it to say I-29, not i-39. I believe it's been confirmed that she was pulled over just north of the charles wheeler airport.

Does I-29 and I-35 combine through that area? It appears that way on google maps. I apologize for my ignorance.
Click to expand...
Yes I-35 and I-29 run concurrently through that area. The next exit(Parvin Rd) just north of I-35/I-29 and Armour/210 hwy intersection is were the two interstates split.

Also the downtown airport (what people in KC call it) runs along 169 which runs parallel to Burlington St/9 hwy.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Does anyone know if the history of the tracker can be looked at to see if it had been disconnected previously? Surely it is possible.
 
marsyao said:
It was obviously she was referring to the 4:30 traffic stop which happened only 10+ min ago, otherwise she would say "OMG just got pulled over 2nd time in 10 min !
Click to expand...

I definitely see your logic, but I have to say that it's vague enough that it isn't exactly crazy to think she could have been talking about getting pulled over a second time in less than 20 minutes.

Which is why the dashcam footage is so important to clarify exactly what happened. I do find it unlikely that police would lie, however it might be true that she got pulled over at 4:25 and 4:40.

At this point, if they told us she indeed got pulled over twice, I'd not be surprised.

I truly hate the idea that a police officer might be involved, and I still doubt it, however given the resistance to simply release the footage and make it clear... suspicion is just a reality that comes with that choice.

I'm going to make a guess that this new man call/text is either a boyfriend on the side, or drug/escort related. Sorry to be so blunt, but **cooperating** gives me the sense that there's been some illegal activity and a reason why this person wouldn't have come forward much earlier. I'd find it odd if they said the parents were **cooperating**.
 
skibaboo said:
9-Highway and 20th Avenue for an illegal lane change http://fox4kc.com/2017/01/18/police-tracing-missing-20-year-old-womans-steps-after-traffic-stop-with-nkc-police/

View attachment 108207

Case Map https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QiQ6DeyqNJRmyxmEpDgDokxLctE&usp=sharing
Click to expand...
Okay then she may have taken I-435N from work to 210W/Armour to Burlington/9 hwy. Which is completely opposite of were it's been reported she was planning on going.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Plombage said:
Okay then she may have taken I-435N from work to 210W/Armour to Burlington/9 hwy. Which is completely opposite of were it's been reported she was planning on going.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yep :) welcome to the confusion and sketchiness that we are all enjoying regarding that topic and others!
 
- Is it verified how much gas she pumped? Did she have a full tank or was she unable to pump any because her card was declined?

- Also I assume that LE's vehicles are equipped with GPS. Perhaps retracing the path that the officer took after pulling her over might help lead to clues or evidence if the officer is involved somehow.
 
I don't think the amount of gas (if any) has been disclosed at this point.

More information on her ATM transaction would be really helpful. For example:

1. We don't know how much money she tried to take out.
2. We don't know how much money, if any, she succeeded in taking out. (We just know 1 of the 2 transactions was declined.)

If she successfully took out a lot of money (say the maximum, which at my bank is $1k) and then tried to take out more, that might explain why the second one was declined. It also might suggest her possible intentions (either a big purchase or a trip?). And might narrow the field to make us guess she either left of her own accord or ran into trouble when spending that money in some sort of transaction.

If she took out only a little bit of money to pay for gas and snacks, though, or wasn't even able to get out a small sum (say because someone else drained or froze the account on her), that also would suggest possibilities.

My guess is she had enough money on her, either way, to purchase some gas. I waitressed in high school YEARS ago and in a normal dining establishment. After work, I always had cash on me from tips. My guess is she'd have more than I did.
 
MaxManning said:
I definitely see your logic, but I have to say that it's vague enough that it isn't exactly crazy to think she could have been talking about getting pulled over a second time in less than 20 minutes.

Which is why the dashcam footage is so important to clarify exactly what happened. I do find it unlikely that police would lie, however it might be true that she got pulled over at 4:25 and 4:40.

At this point, if they told us she indeed got pulled over twice, I'd not be surprised.

I truly hate the idea that a police officer might be involved, and I still doubt it, however given the resistance to simply release the footage and make it clear... suspicion is just a reality that comes with that choice.

I'm going to make a guess that this new man call/text is either a boyfriend on the side, or drug/escort related. Sorry to be so blunt, but **cooperating** gives me the sense that there's been some illegal activity and a reason why this person wouldn't have come forward much earlier. I'd find it odd if they said the parents were **cooperating**.
Click to expand...

I agree. And "cooperating" just means he's talking to police and hasn't yet refused to talk or hired an attorney. It doesn't necessarily mean that he's completely innocent. Plenty of people that go on to be arrested and/or convicted were at some point "cooperating" with police. I don't take this to mean LE has a witness helping them figure things out. This may be all it is, but the lack of info being released by LE leads me to believe they're onto someone and don't want that person to know what LE knows.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
DatelineFan said:
Or she wasn't alone in the car.
Click to expand...

they have already said she appeared fine and was alone in the car, cop talked to her for one minute, video shows her pull into the gas station, get gas, and leave on her own.
 
Have they said if police have her phone records yet? It's also possible the last person who texted her (if not the bf) may have come forward on their own and volunteered the information about their communication to police once he learned she was missing.
 
drjones said:
they have already said she appeared fine and was alone in the car, cop talked to her for one minute, video shows her pull into the gas station, get gas, and leave on her own.
Click to expand...

Can you share the source that confirms she got gas? All I've seen is the police saying the officer saw her pull into the gas station, but it doesn't confirm whether he stayed to watch her pump gas or saw her go in to pay and left etc. That source is http://fox4kc.com/2017/01/18/office...woman-to-gas-station-before-she-went-missing/
 
I am having trouble following a lot of this case.

So did her car actually have a GPS? Or just something that tracked her speed for insurance purposes?

I would like to know why they aren't releasing video or images of her at ATM or during the traffic stop.
 
AmyPond said:
I am having trouble following a lot of this case.

So did her car actually have a GPS? Or just something that tracked her speed for insurance purposes?

I would like to know why they aren't releasing video or images of her at ATM or during the traffic stop.
Click to expand...

At first they said it was a GPS. Later that was changed to say it only tracked her speed. However, there continue to be statements that the GPS last tracked her to the QuikTrip.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Maybe, like a cell phone, the GPS doesn't give exact routes, but the "pings" do tell which tower she was closest to when it sent a signal...so they can estimate a possible route?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 152 more.
Total: 982 (members: 153, guests: 829)

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
829
Total visitors
982
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
598,332
Messages
18,079,680
Members
230,612
Latest member
Mandi_lee
Back
Top