singularity,
Nope, that's fake news, you should read here more often.
No it isn't "fake news". BDI was parroting that very statement for months during the hoopla. Maybe its not parroted to the extent that it was because they've dug a bit deeper on the issue.
Speaking of fake news, this interview of Burke conducted by Kolar that you keep mentioning that doesn't actually exist would qualify as fake news. You should read here more often.
What I've said in the past and stand by, is that BDI answers more questions than any other theory including PDI.BDI is more consistent than any other RDI theory, and helps explain more of the evidence, it should be your default theory.
Even you claim this case "
looks PDI" so I don't see how it answers more questions than any other theory and explains more of the evidence when you admit that most of this evidence is linked to Patsy.
We have Burke telling police officers to look in the house for JonBenet because she is still here.
Wait....what?
You have your supposed murderer telling police to look for his murder victim in the house?
You have Burke's voice on the 911 call.
If this is proof of guilt, I guess all three of them were in on it together.
You have Burke lying about being asleep until awakened by an officers flashlight, duh.
Obviously nobody was sleeping that night/morning. It doesn't prove anything one way or the other.
You have Burke telling Kolar he opened the gifts in the wine-cellar?
Fake news.
Why would Burke Ramsey want to inject himself into the case by claiming to have been in the wine-cellar the same day JonBenet was killed and dumped in there?
That is a good question. Why would a supposed murderer tell people he was in the same room as his murder victim the same day, tell people he went downstairs around the time of the murder, and supposedly told cops to look for his murder victim in the house?
Think it might be because he's not her murderer?
If he played in the basement on a regular basis, going in or near the wine cellar wouldn't be a big deal either way.
This means Kolar, who is better read on this case than anyone else on this forum, does not think JR was involved until late that morning!
I'm not a 100% on that, then again I've not seen all the evidence Kolar has.
Kolar is not the only person to see all the evidence. There were many. Kolar is the only one that is BDI.
That would explain away all those personal comments in the RN,
Nothing in the ransom note points towards BDI. Nothing.
and JR coming out with stuff like Its an inside job.
So John said that in an attempt to point the finger at his nine year old son?
Kolar thinks BR did it all...
I'm well aware of that. It simply doesn't add up.