Found Deceased TX - Kaytlynn Cargill, 14, Bedford, 19 June 2017 #3 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
They could still be waiting on DNA. For some reason it seems to take absolutely forever.
 
Wrigley's_Human said:
If you go back and look at Ying Ying's thread before the loser was arrested, lots of questioning of LE, worrying, saying it's not going to be solved, etc. All the while LE was working on it and got the guy (and hopefully YingYing soon). KC hasn't been gone 2 months yet. I too hope that there is justice for her and answers for her family.

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

MIKAYOYO said:
I think they know COD and have someone in sites. This case is too quiet. If I'm this girls family right now I'm raising all kinds of hell but they aren't. I really believe Le is on this and just waiting for that one link. IMO
Click to expand...

Both of your posts proved prescient I feel. We always think nothing is going on when a lot of going on.

I agree that LE has an inkling as to who the culprit is.

Trinitee said:
Thinking of Kaytlynn today.
Click to expand...

And then bam! The very next day we get
news!! You've got radar I think!

ATasteOfHoney said:
......imho because they know who did this & are delving into forensic evidence to determine motive & if the murder was premeditated to build a rock-solid case
Click to expand...

Precisely. Folks, the moment the arrest someone the clock starts to run on the defenadt's right to anspeedy trial. Over and over people complain about how long it takes for an arrest. In some cases I think the delay is unjustified (Dylan Redwine and Susan Powell for example), but many times they're simply taking the time to build a rock solid case. We never know what's happening behind the scenes.

Ive been hopeful since she was found that it's very solveable case because the body was found quickly, and due to certain comments from LE - no danger, some people's statements were inconsistent, etc, - and their actions in removing the ME report from public view. I didn't like how LE handled things at first but as people explained, they aren't going it alone.
 
ninij9 said:
It's what I have thought from beginning. [emoji17]

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Yep, me too. I hope one/some of her friends in the park saw this person -- or saw her going to a certain apartment -- that would have been a big deal & a good place for the LEO's to start. (Dream on, I'm sure...)
 
I followed this case off and on. While I didn't completely rule out drugs, I would have been greatly surprised if it turned out that way. It just didn't seem to fit the circumstances or what others said about Kaytlynn.

One thing about this I can't seem to get out of my mind - could the killer or killers be other teenagers? I don't get that feeling with about 99% of the cases here, but somehow I feel the probability is higher here. I don't know why I have that gut feeling either as I can't point to any one thing that makes me feel that way.
 
I'm just not feeling like kids are responsible for this, but that's only my opinion.

ETA - I feel like if kids were responsible we would've heard something by now. Kids talk. I haven't read any rumors anywhere naming certain kids that may have bullied her. If that were the case I don't think it would be this quiet for this long.
 
Was there ever a completely verified 'version' of Kaytlynn's dog being tied to the fence?

Where was young Kaytlynn running off to?

If Kaytlynn was going to meet someone, did LE scrutinize all of her electronic gadgets? Her SM?

How well did she know, or not know, the person responsible for her homicide?

The ME report states Homicide. Where did the Homicidal Violence descriptor come from?

*Justice For Kaytlynn*
 
jday10 said:
Update from Bedford Police:
[video=twitter;895748585526108160]https://twitter.com/BedfordTXPD/status/895748585526108160[/video]
Click to expand...

I never thought I would live long enough to see this notice!! Thank God they are moving forward!! I had stopped reading the Police Departments posts & had stopped reading the news related to this case.
 
It's my opinion that where "drugs" comes into play in this case is with the murderer(s).
They liked their drugs.
Moo
 
"No threat to the public". That's quite a statement indeed. So it would seem then they have definitely ruled out a random predator, and/or they've got someone in their sights. Moo.
 
Dare we hope there is an arrest just around the corner? I have theorized before that if the killer was another teen the police would try to make an arrest before school started on the 17th ( think). If the killer were a teen, the other teens need a little time to settle down before starting school because it would certainly be a shocker for them. This is nothing more than rambling thoughts running through my head.
 
faw720 said:
Dare we hope there is an arrest just around the corner? I have theorized before that if the killer was another teen the police would try to make an arrest before school started on the 17th ( think). If the killer were a teen, the other teens need a little time to settle down before starting school because it would certainly be a shocker for them. This is nothing more than rambling thoughts running through my head.
Click to expand...

I'm beginning to think the COD was accidentally released. I do hope and pray they have someone on their radar. If the COD was released intentionally then I'm thinking an arrest is imminent. Poor sweet girl. So heartbreaking.
 
creepcrusher said:
I'm just not feeling like kids are responsible for this, but that's only my opinion.

ETA - I feel like if kids were responsible we would've heard something by now. Kids talk. I haven't read any rumors anywhere naming certain kids that may have bullied her. If that were the case I don't think it would be this quiet for this long.
Click to expand...
I'm with you creep crusher, I think this one will be close to home, more than just location wise. Just a hunch

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 
Does anyone know what the requirements are for an Amber Alert? I hear of many cases like this where the alerts are delayed or never issued due to criteria not being met. I honestly would prefer unnecessary alerts as opposed to these missed opportunities. I wonder if there is a cost issue?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
margarita25 said:
"No threat to the public". That's quite a statement indeed. So it would seem then they have definitely ruled out a random predator, and/or they've got someone in their sights. Moo.
Click to expand...
or perhaps they know their perp is off the streets.. maybe been arrested on some unrelated charge either coincidentally or purposely by LE while they build their case.
 
By
JnRyan said:
I followed this case off and on. While I didn't completely rule out drugs, I would have been greatly surprised if it turned out that way. It just didn't seem to fit the circumstances or what others said about Kaytlynn.

One thing about this I can't seem to get out of my mind - could the killer or killers be other teenagers? I don't get that feeling with about 99% of the cases here, but somehow I feel the probability is higher here. I don't know why I have that gut feeling either as I can't point to any one thing that makes me feel that way.
Click to expand...

Because LE made some sort of statment about how the teens' stories didn't jibe. I can't find a link now though.

creepcrusher said:
I'm just not feeling like kids are responsible for this, but that's only my opinion.

ETA - I feel like if kids were responsible we would've heard something by now. Kids talk. I haven't read any rumors anywhere naming certain kids that may have bullied her. If that were the case I don't think it would be this quiet for this long.
Click to expand...

That's true. But do we know where kids in the area talk? I mean social-media wise?

stacipr said:
Does anyone know what the requirements are for an Amber Alert? I hear of many cases like this where the alerts are delayed or never issued due to criteria not being met. I honestly would prefer unnecessary alerts as opposed to these missed opportunities. I wonder if there is a cost issue?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yes. An Amber Alert wouldn't have helped in this case. The criteria are a description of an abudctor or vehicle used by the abductor. None of that occurred in this case- no vehicle description and no abductor description.

As many have discussed, if amber alerts were issued every time a kid went misisng they'd become as frequent and as ignored as car alarms.
 
gitana1 said:
By
Yes. An Amber Alert wouldn't have helped in this case. The criteria are a description of an abudctor or vehicle used by the abductor. None of that occurred in this case- no vehicle description and no abductor description.

As many have discussed, if amber alerts were issued every time a kid went misisng they'd become as frequent and as ignored as car alarms.
Click to expand...


Thank you for the information. I had not thought through the issue of overload on the alerts. It's a very good point and helps me understand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
This is only JMO. I am hoping for an announcement of arrest tomorrow. You're all sleuthers..............go sleuth.
 
I think this is a case of a gang of mean girl gang beating up a girl because she wasn't like them. In her pictures it looks like she was a tom boy (i was too) and didn't like it. Jmo

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 169 more.
Total: 1,925 (members: 170, guests: 1,755)

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
1,755
Total visitors
1,925
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
600,070
Messages
18,103,451
Members
230,985
Latest member
PIBrilliant
Back
Top