D
Deleted member 278
Guest
Can I ask to any experts on the matter...I would think that DN would of been charged by now especially since he admitted he had a rifle in his trunk. Would we not know if that gun had been recently fired? Would there be some kind of per say "footprint" that would indicate this was the gun used on the cyclist? Do we know that the gun DN spoke of was actually a rifle?
Ballistic tests will prove or disprove whether his gun was used to kill the cyclist. I don't know how long that takes. Does anyone know the normal length of time?