Bill Carson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,673
- Reaction score
- 8,555
I just posted that because I realized my original post about it was deleted in the beginning. I didnt want anyone to think this was just an Aspergers issue or that I felt it was the only issue in play here
Here is NB's complaint against SS on December 15, 2017. This is a public record obtained from the court's website.
Moderators, if this is not permitted, let me know.
Here is NB's complaint against SS on December 15, 2017. This is a public record obtained from the court's website.
Moderators, if this is not permitted, let me know.
Lets hope so!! I'd love to hear what else you've uncovered!! There are so many other scary characters in her life, that we're not allowed to discuss, so it makes it difficult and we can only discuss the obvious which of course is SS.Can they be discussed here?
Here is NB's complaint against SS on December 15, 2017. This is a public record obtained from the court's website.
Moderators, if this is not permitted, let me know.
If the police have already looked at SS and dismissed him... does anyone know if she had a boyfriend or ex that could have done this? Someone had to have rage against her which implies a deeply personal relationship... I sincerely doubt it was a random stranger
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lets hope so!! I'd love to hear what else you've uncovered!! There are so many other scary characters in her life, that we're not allowed to discuss, so it makes it difficult and we can only discuss the obvious which of course is SS.
anyone with a subscription to "radio reference" scanner can go back and listen to old dispatches in the log by date fyi--
The speculation about her family or other theories I've seen out there is incredible nonsense, IMO, based on nothing but rumor and innuendo, mostly gleaned from SS's own statements and the rest just wild theories based on fertile imaginations and family member or friend's characters.
Here are the exhibits that NB used at the protection order hearing on December 22. Again, this is a public document, downloaded from the court's website.
What I find interesting about the PO papers is that her address is listed as Northglenn but reports stated she went missing from her apt. in Broomfield. I’ve seen talk on SM suggesting she had just moved to that apartment. Given she does not accuse SS of showing up at her residence anytime recently(it sounds like VA was the last time which was at least a year ago) and he doesn’t appear to have a car, how would he have known where she lived if she had moved within this short time frame?
I’d like to reiterate that thinking SS may not be guilty of Natalie’s murder does not mean anyone is condoning his actions or defending him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can they be discussed here?
Thank you.What I find interesting about the PO papers is that her address is listed as Northglenn but reports stated she went missing from her apt. in Broomfield. Ive seen talk on SM suggesting she had just moved to that apartment. Given she does not accuse SS of showing up at her residence anytime recently(it sounds like VA was the last time which was at least a year ago) and he doesnt appear to have a car, how would he have known where she lived if she had moved within this short time frame?
Id like to reiterate that thinking SS may not be guilty of Natalies murder does not mean anyone is condoning his actions or defending him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think you need to reiterate that since no one has stated that feeling he may not be guilty equates to condoning his actions or defending him.
Downplaying his serious stalking does that. As does infering she exaggerated or claiming he's too protective or sweet to harm anyone.
As to how he would know where she lived, he could simply ask someone. Or use the internet. But why would he have to know that? He likely knew where she went to school or hung out. Do we have evidence that she was snatched from her home?
Here are the exhibits that NB used at the protection order hearing on December 22. Again, this is a public document, downloaded from the court's website.