I'm bringing over the below post from the last thread:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3109961&postcount=659
Today, 10:42 AM
PaddieAB
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SuziQ
I don't like this theory because it throws JG under the bus for OJ charges when the only people being investigated for OJ are the Anthony's. There is no indication anywhere that JG has commited a crime or being investigated for one whatsoever. The A's on the other hand are being investigated.
And IIRC, the Anthony's are the ones who orchestrated a gathering of Casey's friends at their house to talk to them all. Also per the Anthony's, they've "reached out" to people that are witnesses in this case. Lee was the one doing an "investigation". Witness tampering comes to mind.
I appreciate your thoughts. I don’t want to take this thread OT, but in reply I would say remember this case is nowhere near being solved and it could turn any direction before it goes to trial, or even during trial because Casey’s lips are sealed. She’s not confessed. We know LE has enough evidence to charge Casey with murder, but remember those charges were laid even before Caylee’s body was found.
There has been no information released at all to indicate what basis the prosecution will take this case to trial.......how it happened - how Caylee died, when she died, and how she was able to the coverup what she did.
Who is being investigated is what the media has led us to believe, and believe me all the defense attorneys are leaking tidbits through the media to give the perception their client is innocent. The LE are not required to keep the public up to date with their investigation, how could justice ever be served if they were. All they are required to do is reveal documentation and that's what has been released.
So it’s very unusual for Lee’s attorney to state his client “might” have pending charges. What would his motive be? On the surface it makes no sense why he would want to shed a negative light on his client. So I'm suggesting there's another reason and that's to make someone a little less comfortable in their portrayal of innocence. It's a cat and mouse game and it happens all the time. That’s why I think what I think, and I could be right or wrong.
But this pretrial posturing is what makes following a case intriguing.
****
ITA that we don't know everything or all who LE is investigating behind the scenes. The problem I have is throwing JG into the OJ mix when there is not knowledge of this even being a remote possibility.
As far as the pretrial and pre-charge posturing through their attorneys, this is simply a new outlet for the Anthony's. They've always overexplained, answered questions before they were asked, and gone on the defense before needing to, on issues that at the time seemed trivial to us. Then soon after there is a doc dump or some event that makes it clear what they were talking about. They did it in the media and now they are demanding their attorney's do so. It's been a definite predictor on what's in store in this case. For that reason I believe that if the attorney's say OJ is a real pending threat to their clients, it really is. Typical behavior from the "A-Team", IMO.
I suspect in the not so far a way future, that we'll find out why Cindy went on about washing Caylee's sheets.