2010.12.21 Stream of Motions - General Discussion

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

RR0004 said:
Ah...but she wasn't arrested for murdering her child just yet. It will be interesting to see what exactly the State wants included.
Click to expand...

Correct, but her daughter was still "missing":twocents: She was charged with child neglect at this time. Those charges were only dropped because they were based on the premise that her child was alive.
 
Is there any word on the motions from yesterday on JB's motion to strike States motion to show cause and also their suggestions for order of presentation and witness list?

I'm dying to read them!!
 
Jomo said:
Is there any word on the motions from yesterday on JB's motion to strike States motion to show cause and also their suggestions for order of presentation and witness list?

I'm dying to read them!!
Click to expand...

Me too..:D
Just checked the Court site..it's not up yet..so still :waiting:
 
I can't find the jail reaction video thread - but what I want to know is will this now be released under Sunshine laws? I still want to see it - from a psychological interest point of view.
I agree and am glad they aren't pushing to use it at trial - I think it would be an appeal :worms:.......... so, will the media attorney(s) file a motion to have it unsealed and released? Thoughts - answers?

------------ edit to add: What about after the trial - any chance we will see it then?
(Mods - feel free to move, if you can find the thread!) :HHJP:
 
Intermezzo said:
iirc, Yes she did attempt to call boyfriend Tony ...she also called 2-3 other(Chris.S, Jeff H house..and ?) guys from jail within days of her arrest on July 16th...
I think I read it at the Hinky Metet timeline..but haven't found it again

here is one..
http://humbleopinionforum.net/cma-timeline-july-1-16-2008/cma-timeline-july-13-–-19-2008/
July 16th
11:30 p.m. After her unsuccessful attempt to speak with Tony L. on the phone, Casey placed a collect call from the OC Correction Facility to Chris S. After hearing the announcement recording and Casey’s voice stating her name, Chris hangs up the phone. She called back about 3 to 4 minutes later, but Chris did not answer the call.
------------------------------------

this has always been ??? for me..it's July 16..everyone now knows Caylee is "missing", Casey is upset with her family, angry with LE and instead of focusing on Caylee and her family she HAS to call at least 3 guys from jail...
Click to expand...

iirc, in his interviewhe said he didn't answer, called his parents who agreed he should not take her call. Then I guess she tried again.
 
A_News_Junkie said:
I can't find the jail reaction video thread - but what I want to know is will this now be released under Sunshine laws? I still want to see it - from a psychological interest point of view.
I agree and am glad they aren't pushing to use it at trial - I think it would be an appeal :worms:.......... so, will the media attorney(s) file a motion to have it unsealed and released? Thoughts - answers?
(Mods - feel free to move, if you can find the thread!) :HHJP:
Click to expand...

AZ said she thinks not because it was kept private so as not to taint the jury pool.
 
strawberry said:
Great news! I actually feel like I really am getting sick! My head is about to explode! I may have to go home tomorrow after my mandatory 8 o'clock meeting!!!
Click to expand...

Blah I'm sick today--exactly the WRONG day to be sick as now I'll have to work twice as hard tomorrow and read 120 pages of posts at the end of the day lol. :)
 
Well, I suffered through it and man oh man, you will need the cocktail!
 
Anyone care to give a summary? I am at an awards banquet right now and all the drinks are nonalcoholic, lol!
 
When I went in to work last night, I told my boss that there would be no possible way that I could come in early on Wednesday... which they have a habit of calling me in early (life of a bartender) all the time. I am off on Thursday and I told them I would not even be in town (which I will) so not to even call me if they needed someone.

Obsessed? Me? Noooo!!
 
AZlawyer said:
It is SO hard to read JB's stuff. :banghead:
Click to expand...

Oh my! JB did intern with some real lawyers right? I mean didn't he work for the public defenders office or somesuch before he was admitted to the bar? Does anyone know if he ever participated in any cases that actually went all the way to trial? Did no one teach him that you don't throw this much waste matter at the judge and opposition if you hope to have anything even vaguely resembling a happy outcome for your client?

I mean really? In the case of this Motion to Show Cause. A real professional lawyer would suck it up to the benefit of his client. "I'm sorry your honor. I misread the document and missed that you had required a summary of all including what had previously been filed. As soon as I was made aware of this error I contacted the court seeking clarification and advisement. I have since submitted to opposing council the required materials and hopefully we should all be square. My deepest apologies to the court and my opposing council on this one. I dropped the ball and misread the sentence in the order. I would request that my client not be impacted by this."

Politely and meekly take the bullet. Accept the tongue lashing. Promise not to do it again and move on. That's really all JA wants. He is simply rattling the defenses cage with this seeking to push the issue that deadlines can no longer be ignored and he expects a certain minimal degree of professional conduct from the defense. Sadly JB's filing proves that he still does not get it. And guess what JB. Yeah the op council can harass you for your blatant screw ups and mistakes. The trick is don't make any.
 
faefrost said:
Oh my! JB did intern with some real lawyers right? I mean didn't he work for the public defenders office or somesuch before he was admitted to the bar? Does anyone know if he ever participated in any cases that actually went all the way to trial? Did no one teach him that you don't through this much waste matter at the judge and opposition if you hope to have anything even vaguely resembling a happy outcome for your client?

I mean really? In the case of this Motion to Show Cause. A real professional lawyer would suck it up to the benefit of his client. "I'm sorry your honor. I misread the document and missed that you had required a summary of all including what had previously been filed. As soon as I was made aware of this error I contacted the court seeking clarification and advisement. I have since submitted to opposing council the required materials and hopefully we should all be square. My deepest apologies to the court and my opposing council on this one. I dropped the ball and misread the sentence in the order. I would request that my client not be impacted by this."

Politely and meekly take the bullet. Accept the tongue lashing. Promise not to do it again and move on. That's really all JA wants. He is simply rattling the defenses cage with this seeking to push the issue that deadlines can no longer be ignored and he expects a certain minimal degree of professional conduct from the defense. Sadly JB's filing proves that he still does not get it. And guess what JB. Yeah the op council can harass you for your blatant screw ups and mistakes. The trick is don't make any.
Click to expand...

BBM

Amazing. I've already seen several good responses to the motion for order to show cause in WS posts, but JB had no clue what to say. :banghead:
 
Direct quote:

" There is no other way to describe this attitude in a capital case other than Mr Ashton does not want to do the work required."

OH.
EM.
GEE.


<thud>
 
OMG, I read it and then had to get up, walk around for 10 minutes and read again. I truly believe that Cheney Mason (or someone who is a real lawyer) helped with the first portion of the motion. They probably returned it to JB and he just ranted & raved his way through the rest as he probably knows that JP would cut him off as soon as he started his whining. And may I ask why he is ranting and whining through this motion and blaming everything on Ashton as it is the judge's order that he did not comply with. He came very close to stating that he thinks the judge is not being impartial. I hope he gets slapped silly tomorrow. I still think that is why he asked in his e-mail to the judicial assistant that he wanted this discussed "in chambers". I still cannot believe what I read. If this is any indication of what we will see at trial, you almost have to feel sorry for Ms. Casey. (I said almost). I'm sure when Mr. Ashton read that he probably put a fist through a wall. Really!!!:twocents:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 73 more.
Total: 268 (members: 74, guests: 194)

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
194
Total visitors
268
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,327
Messages
18,252,673
Members
234,625
Latest member
XtraGuacPlz
Back
Top