Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not AZlawyer by any means, but poster named Evangeline from Hinky posted this:hey AZlawyer, you wouldn't happen to be familiar with the case the esteemed Judge cited would you? Parks v. State , 644 So. 2d 106 tia for any info you can pass along.
hey AZlawyer, you wouldn't happen to be familiar with the case the esteemed Judge cited would you? Parks v. State , 644 So. 2d 106 tia for any info you can pass along.
Baez looked a angry to me went he was talking to Medina at the very end.
Someone asked me a couple of pages back how I thought CM was doing. The answer is, "badly."![]()
Yeah, I posted the link a couple of times but the thread was moving at light speed so you probably missed it.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11829987057721043399&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
I also posted that I didn't think it was applicable to this case.
Someone asked me a couple of pages back how I thought CM was doing. The answer is, "badly."![]()
At the end of the hearing CM told the judge that he was "now familiar with the case". I suppose he read it on the spot after the judge cited it. I don't remember what his remarks were after saying that to the judge.ty turnadot! wow, certainly gives me an idea of what the judge may be thinking. So funny, he cited the case, giving CM an opportunity to rebut it but CM was not even familiar with and therefore could not cite something to counter it.
I like where this seems to be heading can't wait til next week to hear the rulings.
I only wrote "old man" because I was typing verbatium what CM said. Said with respect, I just thought maybe you didn't know he was the one who brought that up. I also did say he was mumbling. but he was. Not trying to argue, just making myself clear. I believe in Websleuths TOS and I support the mods 100%. Trying to be helpful.![]()
Big mistake - HUGE - for CM to insult the intelligence of the Court (and potentially, a jury) by suggesting that Casey is a "child" or even was a "child" when Caylee went missing.
I am glad to hear you say that since your professional opinion is worthy.
I was actually surprised that Mason seemed better than I thought he was going to be today. I guess the bar was set pretty low for my expectations for them, but Mason did not mumble, did not act like he was hard of hearing, and he seemed pretty prepared and on point. Of course, not being an attorney, I have no way to assess his legal points or to know if his case law examples ere actually helpful to his case or not. But I have to admit he did worry be a bit today because suddenly they seemed more competent than I thought they were going to be.
Question, CM said today the detectives knew ICA did not work at Universal before they took her there, true?